The Charlotte News

Friday, February 24, 1956

THREE EDITORIALS

Site Ed. Note: The front page reports from Montgomery, Ala., that the first 27 black citizens brought to court pursuant to grand jury indictments delivered the prior Tuesday, alleging participation in an illegal boycott in violation of state law, entered pleas of not guilty at their arraignments this date, and the charge against the Rev. A. W. Wilson, pastor of Holt Baptist Church, was dismissed by the court at the urging of the prosecutor because the minister had testified before the grand jury which returned the indictments. The judge said that he was therefore "happy" to dismiss the charge as the minister could not be prosecuted on the basis of his own testimony before the grand jury.

In Thomasville, Ga., the President's personal physician, Dr. Howard Snyder, said this date that the President "might be safer" from a health standpoint in serving a second term than before his heart attack, addressing the press on the fifth-month anniversary of the attack in Denver on September 24. The exchange occurred as the President was climbing aboard a hunting roadster near the town, embarking on a new quest for quail. The doctor told the press that he had no impression regarding whether the President had determined to run again, and also said he did not know what anyone could tell regarding whether the President would be able to serve through a second term, that there was no guarantee that another attack would not occur, a similar statement to that which he had made at a press conference on February 14, though indicating then that he had made a good recovery from the heart attack and appeared fit for another 5 to 10 years in a job such as the presidency. Dr. Snyder said, "All he can do is trust in God if he goes ahead."

Julian Scheer of The News reports of HUAC's history, in light of its coming hearings in Charlotte on March 12-14, saying it had been praised and damned during its history since it was chaired by Congressman Martin Dies of Texas in 1938 at its creation. Such persons as Fritz Kuhn, head of the German-American Bund, and William Dudley Pelley, right-wing extremist, had appeared during the Dies era, while more recently, in 1948, Alger Hiss, Elizabeth Bentley and Whittaker Chambers had grabbed headlines. It had become the chief forum for such members of Congress as J. Parnell Thomas, subsequently imprisoned for defrauding the Government through illegal salary kickbacks from relatives and associates who did little or nothing, and Richard Nixon, prominent during the Hiss investigation. The current chairman was Congressman Francis Walter of Pennsylvania and the previous chairman during the Republican controlled House had been Congressman Harold Velde of New Jersey. It had become involved in long, tiresome investigations which had proved fruitless as well in investigations which had ferreted out "disloyal" persons employed by the Government. Representative Walter would be on the subcommittee set to hold hearings in Charlotte. While the itinerant nature of the hearing was new to North Carolina, the Committee had been so engaged previously, the previous year having traveled to Dayton, Miami, Detroit, Portland and other places. During its 18 year history, it had traveled far and wide, looking into every facet of American life, including the Best Picture Academy Award winner for 1946, "The Best Years of Our Lives"—plainly, a subversive piece of Commie propaganda. It had been made a permanent standing committee in 1945 with the purpose of investigating "the extent, character, and objects of un-American propaganda activities" in the country, and the "diffusion … of subversive and un-American propaganda that is instigated from foreign countries or of a domestic origin", and all other questions relating thereto which would aid Congress in providing remedial legislation. Critics of the authorizing resolution pointed out that "subversive" and "un-American" were not defined terms. The Committee had accumulated 600 filing cases of information, with more than a million names, records, dossiers and data pertaining to alleged subversive activities in the country. One of its favorite targets from early in its existence, as Mr. Scheer points out on an inside page, were organizations representing minority groups, alleged to be infiltrated by Communists. Mr. Scheer does not recount of the time, in 1938, when Congressman Joe Starnes of Pennsylvania considered calling before the Dies Committee Kit Marlowe as a subversive writer, though Mr. Starnes had insisted, after the country began laughing out loud at his historical faux pas, that he had only been joking all along. As was said many times, if one dared in those times, the only thing un-American involved with the Committee was itself and its existence within a representative democracy. Had it not been so recklessly dangerous in its charges, it would have continued as a standard joke, as it largely had before 1948 when Mr. Nixon decided to make it very serious in his inimitably unhumorous fashion during the Hiss investigation, which ultimately devolved to attempted identification of Mr. Chambers by Mr. Hiss through his bad teeth, alleged transfer of title to a Model A Ford from Mr. Hiss to Mr. Chambers for a nominal fee, microfilmed "secret" documents, which even Mr. Nixon admitted were innocuous, conveyed to Mr Chambers as a Communist courier allegedly by Mr. Hiss in 1938, and stored by Mr. Chambers first in a dumb-waiter shaft at the home of a relative for a decade before being transferred to the infamous pumpkin on his Maryland farm, all revealed eventually just after Halloween in 1948, with a grand jury, at the urging of Mr. Nixon as its chief witness, indicting Mr. Hiss, then-head of the Carnegie Endowment, formerly of the State Department and a primary aide to the U.S. delegation at the U.N. Charter Conference in 1945 and a lower-level aide to FDR at Yalta in February, 1945, not Mr. Chambers, the admitted former Communist, for perjury.

In Raleigh, State Prisons director William Bailey this date told the State Highway Commission, with authority over the prisons, that he did not see the necessity for concern regarding the uprising on Monday by four prisoners at the Huntersville prison camp near Charlotte, describing it as "nothing unusual". He said, in response to a quoted statement by the Huntersville mayor that the four prisoners should have been in Central Prison, that the latter facility only held 900 inmates and that they had to be spread around to other facilities. He said that the Huntersville camp was designed for misdemeanants and the four prisoners in question were convicted felons, transferred there temporarily and supposed to be in cells segregated from the other inmates. Mr. Bailey pointed out that two of the prisoners had staged a rebellion the previous night at the Stanly County camp but nothing had been said about it by the press or local officials.

Ann Sawyer of The News reports on the trial in Charlotte of a 28-year old woman accused of assaulting her 3 ½-year old step-daughter who had died the prior Christmas Eve. Since September, 1954, the woman had lived with a man, the father of the child, whom she had never married while separated but not divorced from her husband. The woman denied the accusation made by her neighbors of child abuse, saying that burns on the feet and legs of the child had been caused by a flare-up of the floor furnace, that her teeth had come out when she attempted to get the child's tongue out of her throat with a spoon when the child had a convulsion. She showed the jury marks on her hands where the child had bitten her. She admitted tying the arms of the child to her crib to prevent her from scratching herself, but said she had tied only one arm most of the time because she did not have the heart to tie both arms. The jury was expected to receive the case this date.

Near Durham, N.C., a 32-year old construction company employee had suffered cuts and bruises in a cave-in of a rock quarry the previous night, after being trapped for 4.5 hours before fellow employees could rescue him. He had been pinned up to his knees in a hole in the bottom of a large pile of rock. He said that he would tell his wife that he had been in a bear trap. It's good that it is in the paper as she will insist that you were involved in some kind of cat fight otherwise.

In Greensboro, N.C., two basketball players, Bob Cunningham of UNC and Bill Tucker of Wake Forest, had been suspended by the Atlantic Coast Conference commissioner this date "for an undetermined period" for engaging in a fight in a game between the two teams nine days earlier. The Conference commissioner, Jim Weaver, announced the decision following an investigation spanning several days, with the report of the investigation to be submitted to officials of both schools the following Monday, after which they would have five days to appeal the decision to the Conference executive committee, set to meet in Raleigh the following Friday during the ACC basketball tournament, possibly to be expedited by Wednesday, prior to the Thursday start of the tournament. Young Mr. Cunningham, a sophomore from New York City—no relation to the later UNC All-American Billy Cunningham from Brooklyn—would not be able to play this night in an important game against Duke, while young Mr. Tucker, a junior from Louisville, would be unavailable for an equally important match with N.C. State the following night. UNC had won the game in Chapel Hill against Wake Forest by a score of 77 to 73, with the fight erupting at the end of the game, after several players had begun swinging just as the final horn sounded, joined by hundreds of spectators within a few seconds. Mr. Weaver said that he had interviewed all of the players from both teams, the coaching staffs and school officials, and while not minimizing or condoning the behavior of each player involved, he believed that the preponderance of guilt lay with the two players who had first committed "the unsportsmanlike act of a disqualifying nature", thereby inciting their teammates to retaliatory measures. He said that his decision was based on the two players' testimony and that of others. He indicated that control of spectators had to be the responsibility of the host institution, but that spectators could hardly be expected to behave while the participants in the event misbehaved, saying that he found no reason to believe that the spectators would have rushed onto the floor had it not been for the unsportsmanlike conduct of the players. A similar free-for-all during a 1954 football game between the same two schools had resulted in the Conference enacting a rule empowering the commissioner to investigate and act on incidents of unsportsmanlike conduct. Well, they do call them from time to time "cage scraps" on the sports pages, and so what do you expect? You're lucky that they don't choose to settle their differences, after the gauntlet has been laid, with switchblades, coming, as many of them do these days, from the streets of New Yawk.

In Miami, Fla., it was reported that six light planes which had been missing after taking off from Cuba for Jamaica, had been found at Niquero, Cuba, and the 16 missionaries aboard were all safe. Only three of nine such planes had initially reached their destination in Kingston, all of the missionaries having been sponsored by the Church of God of Prophecy in Cleveland, Tenn., on a 3,000-mile tour of the Caribbean islands. Those missing were undoubtedly in the Devil's Triangle until the Devil realized who they were, gagged and coughed them up.

On the editorial page, "Charlotte Aviation: Hesitation's Reward" finds that the extensive time it had taken to hire a new airport manager for Charlotte might actually be a saving grace. The previous manager, David Rea, had died in October, 1955, at a time when the airport had been going through a particularly crucial stage of development, thus leading to impatience to find a new manager. But by proceeding with great care, City Manager Henry Yancey apparently had been able to secure the services of a top individual, A. S. Quinn of Georgia, a former engineer with the Civil Aeronautics Administration and possessed of considerable technical experience in aviation.

Mr. Quinn was coming to Charlotte at a personal financial sacrifice because the post would offer an opportunity for permanence and did not require considerable travel, as had his job with the CAA office in Atlanta for eight years, where he had been in charge of several phases of construction of airports throughout the Southeast. Since 1953, he had been in business for himself while serving as a part-time consultant for Lockheed Aircraft Corp. in Marietta. He also had a degree in electrical engineering from Columbia University and was qualified to prepare plans and specifications for any future airport expansion.

The Charlotte Aero Association had made particular note of long-range trends, indicating that the city would service 15,000 air passengers per month by 1960, a 75 percent increase over originating passengers in 1952. That increase would give rise to added administrative responsibility at the airport and an increase of other activities in the community connected with aviation. Charlotte would need some helicopter service in the future and provision would be needed for jet transports, with increases in air freight, air mail and air express. The city would also need able representation before the CAA and other governmental agencies.

It concludes that aviation in Charlotte would continue to grow steadily and continually contribute to the increased prosperity of the whole community, and that Mr. Quinn would thus be expected to analyze the city's requirements and its future in the air age, offering resourceful leadership in that direction.

"Ammo Depot: Charlotte's Lethal Friend" indicates that one man had reacted to the news that the Navy intended to deactivate the local munitions depot by saying, "So what," finds that reaction, in one sense, correct, as the shell plant was, itself, a shell. Once, however, 12,700 people had worked there, while now only 135 were employed. When it was thriving, the employees received an average weekly wage of around $45, contributing more than a half million dollars weekly to the city's economy, whereas the prior absence of war work in the area had been draining Charlotte not only of salaries, but of carpenters, plumbers, steamfitters and other skilled personnel who left for higher paying war industry work in other areas.

Charlotte had originally sought out the facility through the Chamber of Commerce and through the late publisher of the News, W. C. Dowd, Jr., who was chairman of a Chamber committee which influenced obtaining the shell plant as well as the National Carbon Co., which was presently a larger plant producing military and commercial batteries. The shell plant had made a great contribution to Charlotte's economy and through it, thousands of local residents made a great contribution to winning the war, as millions of shells made in Charlotte had been used in the Pacific warfare.

It ventures that if civic leaders were able to obtain an industrial tenant for the building in the same manner that they had brought the shell plant to Charlotte, it would continue to contribute to the area. It finds that there could never be any basic regret at the closing of the facility which made instruments of war, but to the people who had worked there, the reaction, "so what", was not the correct one either. It finds that the plant had been a "lethal friend, but a friend nonetheless."

"At Wake Forest, a Game of Knucks" indicates that new UNC football coach Jim Tatum had remarked that the team he intended to field would "win more than we lose for the University, is certainly just not average." He intended to do so by recruiting "at least four out of every five of the best football players in the state."

It assumes that by average, he meant a .500 winning percentage, suggests that with four out of the five best North Carolina players, he should increase the percentage to .800, and adding coach Tatum's great skill ought bring it to .900 or .950—meaning at least one tie, possible and fairly frequent in those days.

It questions what then would become of the football teams at Wake Forest, N.C. State and Duke, suggests that the point seemed to be that they were below average institutions which might field a nice marbles team out of the rag-tag group of players overlooked by the scouts of coach Tatum.

A piece from the Wall Street Journal, titled "The Unexpendable Mule", says that the Army could not get rid of its mules despite the fact that mechanical devices had replaced their utility in virtually all applications. But the Army had found that none of the mechanized means of transport could carry a howitzer over mountain crags as could a mule.

It suggests that the mule ought to remain, not only because of its sure-footedness but also because of its character-molding abilities, hearkening back to a story of the Turkish Army a couple of years earlier having imported some 5,000 mules, about which the newspaper had warned that they were as likely to mold the character of their masters as the other way around. For the mule possessed willpower superior to most humans, and intelligence equal to that of many. It also possessed a sense of humor, boundless fortitude, a ferocious eye, a lethal hoof, and could not be bullied.

There were those in the Mississippi Valley who attributed many of the best qualities of Mark Twain, Generals Pershing and Omar Bradley, and former President Truman to boyhood proximity to mules. It suggests therefore that perhaps a few thousand should be attached to every training camp to complement the influence of the drill sergeants and the "'boot drivers'".

Drew Pearson tells of the conflicting memoirs of former President Truman and General MacArthur to be followed by another set of recollections written by General Marshall, expected to take a middle course between the preceding two memoirs. General Marshall, in addition to writing about his experience as World War II Army chief of staff and postwar architect of the Marshall Plan, would write candidly of his former subordinate, General Eisenhower.

The President's Gettysburg farm had been equipped with electronic warning devices which reported the unauthorized presence even of small animals.

The Navy was removing its transport planes from mothballs and offering them to commercial airlines to provide the Navy with a reserve airlift, ready for instant use in case of an emergency.

Despite the announcement that the General Services Administration head, Ed Mansure, had resigned voluntarily, the actual fact had been that he was fired after a showdown with a White House troubleshooter, Fred Seaton, which ended in a loud name-calling argument, Mr. Seaton claiming that an efficiency survey showed that GSA had been poorly run under Mr. Mansure, who had replied that the efficiency experts had neither completed the survey nor reached conclusions. But in the end, Mr. Seaton made it plain that the White House no longer wanted Mr. Mansure in charge.

The Naval attaché in Paris to NATO commander, General Al Gruenther, had not been very helpful, as the former had been arguing around Paris that an atomic war would devastate France, while General Gruenther had declared that the only way Russia could be stopped was through atomic weaponry. The attache's arguments provided grounds to the French against support of NATO and General Gruenther.

The only Republican from California who had voted against the natural gas deregulation bill when it had passed the previous summer had been the former secretary to former Governor Earl Warren, William Mailliard, Congressman from San Francisco.

Joseph Whitney, who provided the "Mirror of Your Mind" advice column to the newspaper, in the fifth of six articles on growing up, examines the subject of parental advice to teenagers regarding sex, suggests that sex and adolescence combined to comprise the principal teenage problem of the present time, that it was not so much a question of whether they should be informed about sex but rather who should inform them, where and under what circumstances.

Teenagers began to develop physically and sexually before their emotional development of childhood had begun to adjust, handicapped by lack of knowledge and understanding of adult ways. They wanted to know how to handle themselves in their new role, how far to "'go'" on a date—go steady—, where the dividing line was between prudence and promiscuity, the right age to marry, facts about pregnancy, venereal disease, premarital sex experiences, and so forth.

Mr. Whitney says that it was, unfortunately, usually the time when parents felt most awkward and uncomfortable with their teenage children, often becoming embarrassed when sex was mentioned, discouraging questions their sons and daughters were eager to discuss. When that occurred, the teenager obtained information on sex outside the home, wherever they could find it, "often a furtive process that adds to their confusion and uncertainty", resulting in misinformation, sometimes sexual experimentation.

Some parents avoided discussions about sex on the basis that it would stir up excessive interest in the subject and give them ideas, encouraging them to experiment. He says that could result if fathers limited their instruction to their sons to "how to take care of themselves", that in a study of 500 male adults reported by Lester Kirkendall in Sex Education as Human Relations, 78 percent of those so instructed had become promiscuous before marriage, while less than one-fourth of those whose parents had given them a liberal education on the subject, freely talking about the problems at home, had engaged in premarital promiscuity.

Various other studies had revealed particular areas relating to sex which disturbed the young people in questions they wanted answered. A study of about 1,500 high school students, reported by Melvin Williams and published in Social Forces in 1949, indicated that about 25 percent were worried concerning their own sexual development and felt ashamed when sex was discussed, while most of them believed they had received inadequate information about sex at home, with girls tending to be more embarrassed than boys by discussions about sex, the boys being worried more about the pressure of their sexual feelings.

The attitude of an adolescent toward sex would be much sounder and healthier, he posits, if it began in the early years, integrating with the other aspects of personality, and never made a special order of business in the home, rather flowing freely and in a matter-of-fact manner when children raised questions, as with any other subject. When such questions were answered with fairy tales or embarrassing half-truths, children would eventually attach unwholesome significance to the range of sex motivation.

The teenager who had gleaned his sexual knowledge from other youngsters or from other sources would usually resent a belated effort by parents to clear up the subject with a special lecture occurring around age 14 or 15 regarding the "facts of life". He regards the young people fortunate who, from early childhood through adolescence, had access to parents or other adults who could make them feel comfortable and answer their questions about sex with forthright intelligence.

A letter writer responds to a recent letter from the faculty member at Campbell College who had been subpoenaed to appear before the special subcommittee of HUAC set to hold hearings in Charlotte in mid-March, this writer indicating that he did not know whether the man had ever been a Communist, and does not care about his political philosophy. He says that he had never been a Communist and had no sympathy with it, but only pity and contempt for those who embraced it. He finds that HUAC, however, rather than performing a helpful service for the country, was only undermining some of the people's most cherished constitutional rights, that often witnesses called before it were damned before they appeared, particularly if they indicated in advance an intention to invoke the Fifth Amendment. He finds that a previous letter writer of February 20, who had taken issue with the prospective witness for his announced intention to be uncooperative, was looking for evil where no evil lurked, says that the witness should have the Fifth Amendment privilege, despite the fact that enemies of democracy had been known to cloak themselves in the country's constitutional rights, the same which they sought to destroy, for if the country denied those rights, it was fighting a losing battle against an enemy which also denied those rights.

A letter writer, a former ice skater, says that he had a strong suspicion that some members of the Auditorium-Coliseum Authority were allergic to ice at the Coliseum, as they had given many reasons why ice skating would not be acceptable, notwithstanding the large turnout recently for the free ice skating night, which had forced them to change their stand. They still appeared, however, to be trying to keep ice skating out of the Coliseum, as it was the only explanation for the high fees which were being charged for the upcoming public ice skating days in March. He finds a dollar per adult and a dollar per skate rental to be excessive, when the skates were costing the Authority only $8.28 per pair and the average lifetime of a pair of skates was about five years. He thinks that the members of the Authority had to be kidding when they were saying that they were not trying to make money but just to break even on the venture.

A letter writer addresses the recent automobile accident involving three cars, in which a student from Harding High School had been killed, along with others, pointing out that the news had appeared on the front page under the headline, "Three Teen Agers Killed in Accident", despite the fact that the reporters were aware that the accident had not been the fault of the teenagers, that the two older male drivers, one of whom had been killed, had been to blame. He says that when people read the newspaper, they first looked at the headlines, and the natural conclusion from the headline at issue was that a teenager was driving too fast, finds it unfair and urges the newspaper in the future to print things so that the readers would know the truth.

The editors respond that the headline of the the February 18 front page story had not used "teenagers" but rather read, "'Year's Worst' Wreck Kills 3 Young People", and that the ages of the three young people killed were 16, 22 and 22.

A letter writer urges voting in May for a Charlotte resident to the County Board of Commissioners, as the taxpayers of the city paid 80 percent of the taxes, urges Judge Hugh Campbell as that candidate.

A letter writer responds to several letters concerning the error and inequity of the present system of Social Security and the need for lowering the age of eligibility. She says that she has some knowledge of the system, that the chance of employment with Social Security coverage had ended for her because of her age, that then had come the hope for self-employment through investment of her emergency earnings into rental units enabling a small rental income which would permit her subsistence living and avoid her placement in the County Home. She had inquired whether the small income would place her under "self-employment" and thereby enable coverage from Social Security, and the answer had been that it would not, that it was not considered self-employment. She therefore wonders what would be considered self-employment.

A letter writer responds to a previous letter published February 17, agrees with the writer, wondering why error sometimes had such a loud voice, saying that having been born and educated in the South and having lived in other parts of the country for 18 years, recently returning to Charlotte, she had been struck by the fear and hostility expressed in current times regarding race prejudice. She had become increasingly aware that many white people in the South were fully in agreement with Brown v. Board of Education and the idea that segregation had to end, but did not speak for fear of disapproval from family, friends and employers. She says that the social scientists who had provided input to the Brown decision had provided ample evidence that segregation in the schools was harmful to children of both races. She finds that children were by nature logical and aware in their hearts that injustice and inequity of opportunity were wrong, that to insist upon their conformance to the wholly undemocratic pattern of segregation created in them a vague but widespread feeling of guilt and anxiety.

A pome appears from the Atlanta Journal, "In Which Is Given A Small Lesson In Manners:

"To Intrude
Is Very Rude."

To Do So Nude
Could Be Lewd.

Framed Edition
[Return to Links
Page by Subject] [Return to Links-Page by Date] [Return to News<i><i><i>—</i></i></i>Framed Edition]
Links-Date Links-Subj.