The Charlotte News

Monday, November 19, 1956

THREE EDITORIALS

Site Ed. Note: The front page reports from Budapest that the Soviet Army and its Hungarian Communist allies this date had broken the general strike in Budapest, but silent Hungarian workers had immediately resorted to a defiant slowdown strike. Between 30 and 50 percent of Budapest's industrial workers had reported for work in the city's factories this date, many of them declaring that they had returned not because they believed the promises of the Soviet puppet Premier, Janos Kadar, but "because we realize that winter is here, with its misery of cold and hunger." In the workshops which Western correspondents were permitted to visit, they had found workers standing around in groups talking but doing little, if any, work. A Vienna report that the Russians were replacing their tank troops in Hungary with 20 fresh infantry divisions lacked confirmation in Budapest. Radio Budapest said that despite 45 percent of the work force appearing at some of the nation's major plants, in most cases, production could not be resumed for lack of power, attributing the absence of other workers to "transport difficulties". At Csepel, the Danube island which was Hungary's biggest industrial complex, workers remained defiant, showing up in their work clothes but not performing any work. Even though they predicted more of the workforce would show up the following day, they said that there would be no real production in the island's huge iron and steel works in the near future. A spokesman for the workers said that it was the only sound thing they could do for the moment, showing up at the plant to obtain their wages while sticking together, indicating that if they remained at home, the plant gates would be locked, making it easier for the Government to pick them off individually and deal with them at home than if they were at the factories standing together. Only two men had done any work in the plants visited this date by Western correspondents, and it turned out they were repairing their own bicycles. About half of the workers at the Hungarian optical works and the GANZ electrical works in Budapest appeared during the morning, with each having about 4,000 employees. Out of the 10,000-man workforce of the MAGAG state machinery factory, about 3,000 had shown up, while about 30 percent of the 38,000 workers at the Csepel iron and steel plants had reported for work. Russian Army officers, as well as Western newsmen, had visited those plants during the morning, with the Russians having politely inquired as to what the Soviet Army could do to help, asking how the workers reacted to the Government's request to end the general strike. The president of the workers' council in the GANZ factory had said that they had told the Russians that the only help they needed from them was to be left alone, and that when the Russians had promised some weapons for their factory guards, had told them that they had their own firearms and now had their own guards for the factory. They believed that their contact with the Russians was better than that of the Kadar Government, as they had succeeded in obtaining the release of 68 students and four workers arrested by the Russians. The report indicates that the deportation of student and worker rebels, originally reported the previous week by Radio Budapest and then denied by the same station, had been one of the sorest points with workers prolonging the strike.

At the U.N. in New York, Cuba this date brushed aside Hungarian protests and pressed for urgent U.N. action to demand a halt to reported Soviet deportations of Hungarians. The Hungarian delegate had told the 79-nation General Assembly that the reported deportations were "invented by counter-revolutionary circles" to create distrust in the Kadar Government. He acknowledged that arrests had been made in an effort to restore order but said that none of the persons arrested had been deported. The Cuban delegate said that the deportations were not propaganda but were fact, indicating that the criminals were not those arrested but those who were loading Hungarians on trains for deportation to Russia. He urged support of Cuba's proposal to demand a halt to the deportations. The Hungarian Foreign Minister was expected to deny the charge of deportation, as had Budapest Radio the previous day. In its revised form, the resolutions cited the principle of the genocide convention and noted particularly provisions against subjecting a group to unbearable conditions and against transferring children to another group. The U.S. had never ratified the genocide convention, but Hungary, the Soviet Union and 52 other nations had. Supporters of the conventions said that two U.S. delegates, Ambassador Henry Cabot Lodge. Jr., and Senator William Knowland, had fought to keep the genocide charge out of the resolution, suggesting that U.S. Senate factions feared treaties and entanglements. Those sources said that it was pressure from Ambassador Lodge and Senator Knowland which had led Cuba, Ireland, Italy, Pakistan and Peru to drop a genocide charge from their resolution adopted November 9, which had called for withdrawal of Soviet troops from Hungary and free elections to be conducted under U.N. auspices. A spokesman for the U.S. delegation would make no comment on the genocide portion of either resolution. The new Cuban draft contained further changes intended to gain the support of countries which had felt that the earlier versions had gone too far based on the available evidence.

In Vienna, it was reported that with chartered airliners slated to begin ferrying of Hungarian refugees to the U.S. during the week, the refugees had discovered this date that they were going to be accepted in the U.S. only "on parole", meaning that they would have no status as permanent immigrants, that they would be subject to further investigation by the immigration services and might have to spend weeks at the Camp Kilmer Reception Center in New Jersey. The first groups were tentatively scheduled to reach the U.S. in time for a "free Hungary day" the following Sunday, with one plane possibly departing Vienna on Wednesday bound directly for Milwaukee, where there was a large population of Hungarian origin. The U.S. had offered to provide visas for 5,000 of the nearly 40,000 Hungarians who had fled to Austria since Russian troops had cracked down on November 4 against the Hungarian drive for independence. Eleven other countries had offered havens for refugees and about 6,000 had already departed for homes in Western Europe. Employees of the U.S. Consulate in Vienna had been putting refugee families through health and security checks for several days in preparation for the first air transport to the U.S. But with issuance of visas started this date, officers of the U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service had taken over and begun stamping the travel papers of the Hungarians for entrance as "parolees". The new development meant that only some 20 refugees would be able to leave Vienna on the scheduled first plane to the U.S. this date, and it was anticipated that the plane would make stops at Linz and Salzburg in an effort to pick up enough refugees with papers to form a full load. There was no immediate explanation in Vienna for the sudden change in the procedure. It had been understood that the Hungarians, many of whom had risked their lives to get across the border into free Austria, would be granted regular immigrant visas under the emergency refugee act. U.S. Immigration commissioner General Joseph Swing, was expected to arrive in Vienna later this date, accompanied by Representative Francis Walter of Pennsylvania, co-author of the McCarran-Walter Immigration Act.

In New Delhi, Prime Minister Nehru told the Indian Parliament this date that Russia's prestige had been "powerfully affected … in Eastern European countries, and noncommitted countries and even among people in the Soviet Union itself." Opening a two-day foreign affairs debate, he said the details of what had occurred in Hungary were not clear but that it was "evident the government of Hungary is not a free but an imposed government, and the people are not satisfied with it."

Also at the U.N., Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjold arrived back in New York this date to tell the General Assembly the results of his talks with Egyptian officials regarding the ceasefire in the Middle East. He planned to initiate arrangements for U.N. help in reopening the blocked Suez Canal, which was a major salvage operation expected to take at least six months. Before departing Cairo, he had said that the Egyptian Government had asked for assistance to clear the canal and he had agreed in principle, declining to discuss other matters taken up with Premier Gamal Abdel Nasser prior to making his report to the Assembly. The chief political aide to Premier Nasser said in an interview that Egypt would clear the canal with U.N. assistance. The Egyptians had already protested British clearance operations underway at the north end of the canal as being in violation of Egyptian sovereignty and of the cease-fire. The Secretary-General talked with Premier Nasser and other Egyptian leaders for three days about the duties of the new U.N. police force, which now had more than 500 men standing by at a base within the canal zone, as well as other details of the ceasefire ordered by the General Assembly 11 days earlier between the Egyptians, the British, French and Israelis, following the invasion of Egypt by the French and British to attempt reopening of the canal following its nationalization the prior July 26 by Premier Nasser and his subsequent refusal to agree with a Western proposal to internationalize it under U.N. supervision. There was no indication that the Egyptians had modified their demand for speedy withdrawal of all foreign troops and stationing of the U.N. forces only at points on the old 1948 armistice line between Egypt and Israel, with the chief political aide of Premier Nasser indicating that Egypt expected the withdrawal to begin during the coming week if possible, without waiting for the U.N. troops to take over. One of the British and French conditions, in agreeing to the ceasefire, had been that the U.N. police force would be competent to "secure and supervise" reopening of the canal, having made clear that they expected the U.N. troops to take over occupation of the canal when they withdrew their forces. At present, the British and French held the northern third of the canal. French Foreign Minister Christian Pineau indicated that he thought the Egyptian appeal for U.N. assistance meant that the U.N. troops would be stationed in the canal zone, despite persistent Egyptian denials. In New York with France's U.N. delegation, M. Pineau said on a television program that the U.N. would not be able to clear the canal unless it had its forces on the canal.

Ambassador to Italy Clare Boothe Luce resigned her post this date, accepted by the President with an expression of "greatest personal regret" and congratulations for "a job superbly done". The effective date of her resignation was left open, but Mrs. Luce told reporters that she planned to return to Italy and to leave her post after the Christmas holidays, that her resignation would presumably become effective when a new ambassador was appointed. She had been Ambassador to Italy since early 1953. In her letter of resignation, made public by the White House, she mentioned her recent poor health and said that she would require several months of rest. The President said that he hoped she would eventually return to government service. Mrs. Luce said, however, that she had no such plans at present. She said there was no mention in the hour-long conference with the President of her becoming ambassador to India.

Attorney General Herbert Brownell this date called a conference to plan a course of action for Federal authorities in the South, in the wake of the November 13 Supreme Court decree striking down racial segregation on public intra-state buses. The Court had not issued a formal opinion but merely affirmed the prior District Court ruling of the previous June, basing the affirmance on Brown v. Board of Education, Baltimore v. Dawson and Holmes v. Atlanta. The meeting was scheduled for December 10 and the Attorney General had asked 34 U.S. Attorneys stationed in 14 Southern states to attend, stating that the conference would consider and decide upon measures most appropriate to secure observance of the Constitution and laws by carriers and all others who might subsequently require segregation of white and black passengers on common carriers. Mr. Brownell instructed the Southern prosecutors to bring with them copies of any local or state law in effect in their districts relating to racial segregation. He said that in view of the November 13 decision invalidating Alabama and Montgomery statutes and ordinances on the subject, it was now clear that any such law, statute, ordinance or regulation had to be regarded as "dead letter".

It had been reported on the front page the prior Thursday that in the wake of the Supreme Court affirmance, 5,500 hymn-singing persons had crowded into the Holt Street Baptist Church in Montgomery the previous night and voted unanimously to end the boycott which had begun the prior December 5 after the arrest of Rosa Parks for not giving up her seat to a white passenger at the direction of a bus driver. The Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr., had told the cheering group, members of the Montgomery Improvement Association, that the decision of the Supreme Court should reach Montgomery courts within several days and he urged calmness and restraint when it came, that until then boycotters at the church and at a similar meeting on the other side of town had agreed unanimously that they would walk to work or share rides with friends. The prior Tuesday, a State circuit court judge had granted the City of Montgomery an injunction stopping car pooling by blacks, which had provided transportation since the beginning of the boycott, and a Federal District Court judge had refused on Wednesday to issue an injunction blocking City interference with the carpools. Reverend King had urged those at both meetings to be "calm and reasonable with understanding, goodwill and Christian love", that they should not take it as a victory over the white man, but receive it with dignity, urging people not to return to the buses and push people around, that they were just going to sit where there was a seat. He added later that he wished he could say that when they went back to the buses on an integrated basis, there would be no white person who would insult them or that violence would not erupt, but that he could not say that because he did not know. He urged that if someone pushed them, not to push that person back, indicating that they had to have the courage to refuse to hit back. The manager of the Montgomery bus system, the patronage of which had dropped by more than 30,000 per day during the boycott, said that drivers would continue to enforce segregation until formally relieved of the State-prescribed duty. The Montgomery City Commission made no comment the prior week.

Also on November 13, Justice Felix Frankfurter, in the context of the appeal from Ohio of Dr. Sam Sheppard for his second-degree murder conviction entered in December, 1954, had issued a rare, brief statement explaining why the Supreme Court generally refused petitions for writs of certiorari in some cases, while granting in others when four Justices so voted, the Court having that date declined cert. to Dr. Sheppard. The Court, of course, would eventually vote 8 to 1 to reverse the conviction on habeas corpus in 1966, on the basis of the "carnival atmosphere" pervading the 1954 trial, working to deprive the defendant of a fair trial and thus due process, with the second trial then resulting in Dr. Sheppard's acquittal, his defense on both the habeas corpus petition and in the second trial having been supplied by F. Lee Bailey—aided, perhaps, by the intervening power of television, as Mr. Bailey would acknowledge, emanating from the weekly human-interest drama, "The Fugitive", and its depiction of the relentless pursuit of Dr. Richard Kimble by the police lieutenant obsessed with his capture. Unfortunately, Dr. Sheppard, when finally freed, would find little more solace in that freedom than had Dr. Kimble in his "freedom" achieved only by the bracelet-severing, supervening fortuity of a train wreck.

Nine Charlotte men had been released on bond this date following three local raids the prior Saturday on alleged gambling, conducted by special agents of the intelligence division of the IRS against a restaurant, service station and an individual at the Moose Lodge Club. They seized approximately $6,000 in cash and scores of betting cards. They had conducted surveillance for several months and those arrested faced charges of failure to pay special Federal taxes required on gambling.

Julian Scheer of The News reports that Charlotte was strictly small time when it came to big-time gambling, but that there was plenty of small-time stuff going on, with the city having its share of $500 and $1,000 bettors, though no syndicates or mobster gamblers were present, with the larger bets being handled by a small number of local professionals. Most of the gambling was confined to penny, nickel and dime wagers in the butter and eggs numbers racket, traditionally carried on by the black population. Authorities said that Charlotte was a "clean" and "well-enforced" city and that the arrests made the prior Saturday would not set off a wave of new arrests. The local professionals confined their activities to football and other sports bets, receiving bets beginning at one dollar from individuals who sought to pick three or more winners on a card. The bets would zoom to as much as several thousand dollars, betting on almost anything, from presidential elections to Charlotte Hornets baseball games. The odds came from sources in Milwaukee, Philadelphia or New York.

Meanwhile, the newspaper lists next to the story the football card for the prior Saturday, with the slated odds for each game, in case you want to place a bet on one of them the following Saturday. A shrewd bettor could have made some money by placing a bet for longer odds against UNC beating Notre Dame, as they lost by a touchdown plus an extra point. We refrain from comment on the upcoming bowl in Charlotte in 2023 in a couple weeks or so, as UNC's forces will be considerably depleted. Place your bets as you will, or not. Anyone who bets on sports is a prize sucker. It's a sport, dummy.

In Wickenburg, Ariz., an automobile dealer wrote a letter to a customer seeking action on a long overdue bill: "Dear friend, what would all your neighbors think if we came to your town and repossessed your car?" The customer had written back: "I have taken this matter up with my neighbors and they all think it would be a lousy trick."

Speaking of lousy tricks, the day before, as reported a week hence somewhere, one of our dogs got into some poison and wound up dead at the vet, while we were away for the weekend. We think it must have been foul play, as why would the dog get into poison while the family was away, when it never did while the family was present? There is something rotten within the walls of Denmark. Whoever it was may have gotten the notion from reading a TV Guide synopsis in advance of this broadcast which aired that very evening, and decided to test the premise on a poor, helpless doggie that morning. In keeping with the fact that they never tell us anything, however, we never knew that or even noticed that one of the doggies was missing. We cannot say for sure which dog it was, only that it was neither Blackie nor Bambi, and we do not think it was Milwaukee, but possibly Whitey, of whose coloration and form we have no firm memory, leading us to wonder whether Whitey ever existed. It may have been yet another, because the doggie's name was not provided in the reportage of the incident. But whoever you are, we are on your trail...

On the editorial page, "Colonialism: Moscow's Fake Issue" finds colonialism to be the dirty word of the present diplomacy, sticking oddly tightest to the British and French, and, by inference, to the U.S., though the latter was mightily trying to escape the taint through its independent course within the U.N.

The huge Soviet propaganda machine was busy placing that label on the West, eagerly assisted by the neutralist bloc of nations, at present being boosted by the French and British invasion of Egypt, confusing the explosive issues involved in the Suez crisis. The struggle was posed between benevolent communism and greedy colonialism, though not properly so characterized, it instead being between freedom and slavery. Yet, the idea persisted that if only the U.S. could completely escape the onus of colonialism, Soviet influence would dramatically and instantly melt away, a fallacy clearly demonstrated in Egypt's continued coziness with Russia even after the U.S. had repudiated the invasion and initiated in the U.N. the only measures which could lead to peace.

It indicates that colonialism was common to all of the great powers, with the Soviet Union controlling Central Europe, the U.S. remaining in control of Okinawa, while Britain and France clung to the remnants of their once great colonial empires. Historically, no great power could show clean hands on colonialism. But it finds a difference between the Western versions and the Eastern versions, enough to explode the Soviet propaganda were colonialism the actual issue, that difference being that the West had extracted only materials from its colonial possessions while Russia sought to crush the spirit of the inhabitants of the colonies, leaving the remnants to do what Communism bid of them. As the late L. P. Beria, former head of the Soviet secret police, had said of his own fellow Russians: "The people are nothing but sheep; they must be told what to do." Another difference was that the West had given up most of its colonial possessions, with the U.S. having not only freed the strategic Philippines but also having bolstered the independence of other newly independent nations, including Indonesia, South Vietnam and India. The policy of the U.S. had been to persuade Britain and France to grant independence to their colonial possessions, and then, with military and economic aid, to make that independence secure.

By contrast, Russia's policy was best exemplified by the recent atrocities against freedom-seeking Hungarians, its reaching out to the Middle East for even more territory and forced converts to Communism, plus the current efforts to demoralize the West with threats of war. Those threats, accompanied by an attempt to wreck the U.N., it finds ominous, even if serving the beneficial purpose of reminding Americans, British and French of the puniness of their present differences and of the binding ties of common heritage in support of individual freedom. Those ties had been strained by the Suez crisis, but now had to be revitalized by renewed determination to resist Russian slavery.

It finds the thaw in the Cold War and the smile of the post-Stalin era to be over, as had also to be the peevishness and discord among the Western powers regarding colonialism.

"The Queen City Extends Its Horizons" indicates that the opening of Charlotte's new million-dollar public library had extended the cultural horizons of a newly alert and sensitive community, with it being a shame that the event had been observed so quietly, as it would have delighted the early settlers of the area who had always dreamed that Charlotte would not only become a center of trade and industry but would also serve as a center of refinement and letters.

It finds the community's willingness to build such a splendid library in an era of fast-moving economic progress to be indicative of a sound and sensible foundation for the community's growth. More books would be available to more people than ever before in the history of the county, with opportunities for enjoyment, education and aesthetic enrichment becoming virtually unlimited.

Some naysayers said that libraries were going out of style in the country along with reading. When Siegfried Weisberger had closed his famous Peabody Bookshop in Baltimore a few years earlier, he had stated: "The age of the boob is upon us. People don't want books, ideals, culture. They only want dollars." Sometime later, a public opinion poll had shown that only 17 percent of Americans sampled said that they were reading a book, while another survey said that only one college graduate in six was reading a serious book and that only about half of the college graduates questioned could name a book they even cared to read.

It indicates that while that might be true, all Americans had souls, even busy shopkeepers, salesgirls and farmers, and that all were likely to feel the stirrings and demand for the satisfaction of intellectual curiosity. When opportunities for quenching cultural thirst were so varied and attractive, as in Charlotte, even the busiest of citizens were bound to take advantage of those opportunities. It believes that they would and knows that they should.

"An Old Symbol Needs New Support" indicates entry to the season of Thanksgiving and Christmas, that each year, the symbols were reassuringly the same, the brightly colored Christmas lights, turkeys and decorations.

For 50 years, another symbol of the holiday season had been the Christmas Seal. In Mecklenburg County, the Tuberculosis and Health Association had again mailed packets of seals to thousands of citizens, with only the Red Cross drives having predated the work of the tuberculosis groups.

The minimum goal for 1956-57 was only $47,000, with 80 percent of the money collected to remain in the county and 94 percent of it within the state. Locally, the sanatorium at Huntersville, health education, rehabilitation work and scores of other functions were supported by the funding. It urges giving to the work against tuberculosis and for health at home, costing very little.

A piece by Henry Belk, appearing in the Goldsboro News-Argus, titled "What Is News?" says that the Heartless would say it was rape, murder, suicide, shootings, maiming, fires, blasts, tragedy, storms, tornadoes, cyclones, hurricanes, blood in the gutter, more teeth scattered around and legs and arms torn off, atomic and hydrogen bombs, sinkings and drownings, battles and carnage, abortions, seductions, gory details, divorces, Cain, Judas, Attila, Catherine de Medici, Mussolini and Hitler.

But, in contrast, the Poet would say that news was moonlight and starlight, summer dawns and gentle breezes, the essential immortality of man, his courage, his indomitable soul, "'for which I thank whatever Gods there be,'", youth walking hand in hand, male and female, the dove's gentle coo, the thrill of an infant as it made the first tentative clutch of the parent's finger, the uplift of a little hand placed confidently in that of the parent's. And he goes on…

The Philosopher would say that news was of man's relation to men, of man's learning what life meant, of principles of truth and beauty, of ability to determine one's own place in life, of what makes courage, of what makes weakened souls, of the nature of war and peace, of things by which to live, of the comfort of religion and the great faiths, of the essential goodness of all people, of the eternal and everlasting climb of man from his apelike beginnings to an even higher plane.

The Editor would say that news was all of those things and more, a balance of one against the other, the mirror of life of the reflection of little things to which man gave himself, his bornings and his dyings, his babies, his church, his clubs, his comings and goings, and of his great loneliness and ever-present need for assurance.

"Of such is news."

He left out bargain days at his department stores.

Drew Pearson tells of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow having sent the State Department amazing documents, which, if genuine, ought bring a showdown in the entire Near East crisis and the Russian move to send "volunteers" to Egypt. The documents were orders to Russian reservists to volunteer to fight in Egypt.

He indicates that in any totalitarian nation, young men did not volunteer, as things did not occur that way. The U.S. Embassy now believed it had documentary proof that Russian reservists had been ordered to duty in Egypt and that the present plan was to submit those orders to the U.N. for a showdown.

Thus far, the President had not made a decision as to what the U.S. would do if the much-advertised 50,000 Soviet "volunteers" began entering Egypt, having consistently referred the matter to the U.N., where any action would have to overcome a Russian veto on the Security Council and the African-Asian bloc within the General Assembly.

The Joint Chiefs, meeting in almost a night and day session, had reported that the U.S. was in better shape than it would be in the foreseeable future regarding long-range bombers and the hydrogen bomb, being ahead of Russia in those areas.

The National Security Council had decided that in case of outright war, the U.S. would side with Britain, France and Israel, if the Soviets were to send the Red Army into Egypt. But it did not contemplate war in the informal sense, such as that waged by "volunteers" in Korea.

But the President had made no final decision, leaving those matters to the U.N. Thus, the Soviet orders to their reservists to volunteer came just at the right time to force the issue before the U.N.

The Suez crisis had taken a turn for the worse the previous week, with the French even threatening to end the ceasefire, while simultaneously, Premier Gamal Abdel Nasser began swaggering around Cairo as if he had won the war. Premier Guy Mollet of France and his Cabinet were furious because U.N. Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjold had agreed to a formula for the U.N. police force under which it would virtually be under the control of Premier Nasser, whereby the latter could send the police force out of Egypt any time he desired. The French were so upset that they indicated that they would resume fighting rather than agree to those terms, originally having wanted to extend the fighting to the point where Premier Nasser would be either ousted or killed, as they regarded him as the chief tool of the Soviets and the man responsible for stirring up their troubles in Algeria.

A week earlier, Premier Nasser was in a Cairo cellar fearing for his life, but today was conferring several times daily with the Soviet Ambassador and was in constant communication with Moscow, appearing determined to continue the war.

Secretary of State Dulles had not helped soothe French feelings from his bed at Walter Reed Hospital, having advised the President not to meet with Premier Mollet and Prime Minister Anthony Eden, also advising that France and England had to pay cash for oil from the U.S. The Secretary was still upset over the French and British entry to Suez without consulting the U.S., believing that refusal to advance credit for oil and refusal to meet with the French and British heads of state would help to force them out of Suez. Messrs. Eden and Mollet had proposed an emergency conference with the President in Washington the previous weekend, but Secretary Dulles had nixed it, and the White House agreed to let the two leaders and their countries cool their heels for the time being.

Walter Lippmann finds the President's statement about Russian "volunteers" in Egypt incapable of being reasonably interpreted as an attempt to avoid U.S. responsibility and passing of the buck to the U.N., despite there being no doubt that there were men in the Government who wanted to do that. But it could not be done in the instant case, even if the Government wanted to do so, for if the U.N. allowed a force of Russian volunteers to be organized in Egypt and Syria, it would be a disastrous blow to the U.S. and a fatal blow to the U.N.

So he interprets the President's statement as being a call for the U.N. to seize the problem brought into the open by the Egyptian and Russian declarations regarding volunteers. The U.N. had already demanded Russian withdrawal from Hungary and British and French withdrawal from Egypt, and so could not very well allow a Russian army to enter Egypt and Syria, and so the President was correct in working through the U.N. because he had the right to insist that the issue was one which the organization could not evade.

The trained military personnel about which Premier Nasser and the Soviet Government had been talking were not in a true sense volunteers, not capable of being recruited, equipped and transported to Egypt except by the Soviet Government, with the latter having the final say inevitably of where and when they would be deployed. There was no doubt that once that force was established in the Middle East it would have the power to make and unmake the Arab governments and thus to dominate the whole region. He finds the question not to be one which could be disposed of by resolutions, which expressed only an opinion, with the question being whether, with Britain and France having withdrawn from Egypt, the U.N. would permit Russia to enter Egypt.

He indicates that the latest available reports suggested that both the Egyptian and Soviet governments were disposed not to plunge ahead with the volunteer army, with the President's initial warning likely having had a major impact on that decision. With the withdrawal of the British and French forces, there was no reason now on which the Soviet Government could justify sending of the so-called volunteers. But there was also no reason to suppose that the Soviets were giving up on the idea of creating a Soviet military force in the heart of the Middle East, with there being much credible evidence produced, through the capture of Egyptian documents and an examination of captured Russian munitions in Egypt, to indicate a strong probability that a Russian military base was being prepared, with the evidence indicating that military supplies had been shipped to Egypt to await later arrival of the volunteers out of Russia.

He suggests that the time may have passed when the Soviet Government would move a great mass of volunteers into Egypt, but that the world still had to reckon with the probability that Soviet personnel would be coming in quietly and in small numbers over a period of time. It meant that the U.N. force would have a long tour of duty ahead, having to do more than supervise the British, French and Israeli withdrawals, and to do more than deal with the Arab-Israeli border issues.

He indicates that there was a great power vacuum in the region which had been created by the original withdrawal of the British from the Suez in 1954, after which Premier Nasser had sought to fill that vacuum. But his role in the history of the region had not been to create the Pan-Arab empire about which he talked, rather to open the door of the region to the Russian empire.

Marquis Childs, in London, tells of the supply of oil for Western European industry beginning to run low, giving Soviet Communism its greatest opportunity since the end of World War II to paralyze and subvert that industrial center, second in scope and skill only to the U.S. There was an urgent need therefore for the U.S. to counter this stoppage of flow of the vital oil through the Suez Canal and the major pipelines. Officials in the highest level of the British Government said frankly in private that if such measures were not taken by the U.S., the economic and political consequences to the position of the West were incalculable. The same officials were aware of the feeling in the U.S. that Britain and France had brought the disaster on themselves by their attack on Egypt, and that once the attack had been launched, by the failure to move with sufficient speed and force.

The shortage of oil in Scandinavia, neutral Switzerland, West Germany, Italy, Greece and Turkey would soon become acute, as in some countries the reserve supply was sufficient only for a couple of weeks.

Thus, responsible officials in Britain wanted the U.S. to put into effect a plan worked out in detail for bringing Western Hemispheric oil to Europe and helping with the long voyage around the tip of Africa instead of through the Suez Canal. The first essential step was the waiving of antitrust laws by the Justice Departments so that the oil companies could work together to carry out the plan, working with an oil supply committee of the Organization for European Economic Cooperation, including virtually all of Western Europe. Second, and equally important, was for U.S. insistence at the U.N. and in Egypt that the clean-up of the canal and its approaches be carried out by British and French task forces working under U.N. supervision, a key to the entire situation, as Premier Nasser could, by delay, keep efficient Western repair crews out of the canal zone and thereby maintain the canal closed for an indefinite time, serving the purposes of Russia, regardless of whether Premier Nasser would act only as a pawn of Communism or out of his own hatred of the West.

Estimates of the time required to reopen the canal under the most favorable circumstances varied widely, with one high official having told Mr. Childs that at the most optimistic guess, it would take six months.

Before the public, the Government of Prime Minister Eden was maintaining a brave front, with Chancellor of the Exchequer Harold MacMillan even saying in Commons that the Government would achieve its promised budgetary surplus of 1.3 billion dollars. But privately, they disclosed Britain's dilemma, with it being recognized that the Government would be unable to meet the payment of 180 million dollars due at the end of the year in interest and principal on the four billion dollar loan made by the U.S. in 1946. It would be the first time that the Government would have needed to invoke a waiver clause in the loan agreement, with no one being sure what the effect would be of invoking that waiver. Officials hoped that it would provide a year of grace during which Britain's gold and dollar position might be strengthened.

Mr. MacMillan had considered going to Washington to put some of those matters before the Administration on an informal basis, but was aware that such a trip would suggest a distress signal, giving further currency to reports of the imminent devaluation of the pound.

But at present, it appeared that the U.S. wanted to let Britain and France stew in their own juices as a reflection of the outrage resulting from the country's two principal allies having started on their own the invasion of Egypt. Yet, the truth was that all of the West, including the U.S., was in the same stew, conveniently in the meantime serving the interests of Russia.

A letter writer suggests that standing on West Trade St. in Charlotte at the Southern Railway passenger station to let a freight train roll by with four diesel locomotives leading 100 or more boxcars had left in its wake a mile of cars and trucks waiting. He suggests that the remedy would be to get the City and County governments to demand from the State Highway Commission and Governor Luther Hodges that they demand relief from the long trains over Trade Street. He indicates that the public wanted a railroad around Charlotte for the mile or more long freight trains and that the funding for it should come from the Federal highway fund.

A letter writer indicates that there would never be peace until Americans fell on their knees and prayed for peace and for the President, and until they lived a Christian life. "What is best for our safety and happiness lies in trusting Him and following in His directions."

Framed Edition
[Return to Links
Page by Subject] [Return to Links-Page by Date] [Return to News<i><i><i>—</i></i></i>Framed Edition]
Links-Date Links-Subj.