The Charlotte News

Saturday, December 13, 1947

THREE EDITORIALS

Site Ed. Note: The front page reports that in Palestine, fourteen more Arabs and three Jews had been killed by gunfire and bombs, with 81 others wounded this date. Six Arabs were killed in Jaffa from bombs. At Jerusalem's Damascus gate, two anti-personnel bombs exploded in an Arab marketplace, killing six Arabs and injuring 41 others. Two Arabs and three Jews died in a gun battle at Beersheba. The death toll for the previous two weeks since partition was approved by the U.N. stood at 215, with 331 having been killed throughout the Middle East.

In London, the session of the foreign ministers conference scheduled for this date was postponed until Monday, following a heated argument the night before regarding a British proposal on reparations from Germany to Russia. American sources said that the conference was hopelessly deadlocked on the issue, as well on economic unification generally. But Soviet Foreign Commissar V. M. Molotov was said to be agreeable to have the sessions continue. The future of the conference rested with Secretary of State Marshall, who was scheduled to meet this date with Mr. Molotov and Andrei Vishinsky to try to find out the Soviet position on reparations.

A director of the Chicago Board of Trade stated that there would never be any significant Congressional investigation into speculation in the grain market because too many high Government officials had participated in the speculation. Hearings into the grain and corn speculation of Ed Pauley, special assistant to Secretary of the Army Kenneth Royall, were set to continue the following week before the Senate Appropriations Committee.

House Ways & Means Committee chairman Harold Knutson of Minnesota stated that during the last day of the special session of Congress, he would introduce a tax reduction bill for a five billion dollar tax cut.

The Justice Department announced the filing of suit against DuPont for monopolization of the cellophane industry. Attorney General Tom Clark said that the company had produced two-thirds of the domestic cellophane for several years and had acquired a monopoly through foreign cartelization. The suit sought divestment and sale of plants, that others could produce cellophane. The only competitor in the market, the suit alleged, existed at the mercy of DuPont.

Robert Denham, general counsel for the NLRB, ruled against a Nashville, Tenn., firm in seeking an injunction to stop a strike against a CIO union which had not signed the compulsory affidavit of officer non-affiliation with Communist organizations, requisite for NLRB arbitration in collective bargaining under Taft-Hartley.

Margaret Truman told junior journalists in an interview in Kansas City that she and her father did not participate in duets as his musical tastes differed from her classical, operatic repertoire. The President did not play on the piano the songs she normally sang. She said, in response to questioning, that she did not get upset with music critics who were not flattering of her voice, instead had learned much from them. She was not nervous at her debut in the Hollywood Bowl because she was too cold to think of being nervous. She said also that the Secret Service did not tag along with her on dates as she relied on the date for protection.

The North Carolina Education Association asked Governor Gregg Cherry this date to call a special session of the General Assembly, which ordinarily met once every two years for about 90 days, to raise teacher salaries, based on a surplus in the budget, to compensate for the rising cost of living.

Tom Fesperman of The News reports that the oil shortage reached a critical stage this date in Charlotte, as many residents had exhausted their fuel oil supply and would not be able to receive any more before the first of the year. Others were about to run out. Several dealers reported that they had no fuel oil to sell until January. Other dealers stated that their supply was reserved for regular customers. The worst problem was among the families with 50-gallon tanks, as at the units at Morris Field Homes for 404 veterans and their families.

Temperatures in Charlotte this date ranged from 33 to 38 degrees.

Hell of a thing. Make it through the Battle of the Bulge maybe, three years earlier, and come home to suffer through Christmas of 1947 in the freezing cold of winter. What a life.

On the editorial page, "Wallace's Reckless Course" echoes the sentiments expressed by Stewart Alsop this date, that it was a reckless bit of zealotry which had led Henry Wallace to suggest that Senator Taft should be the GOP candidate for 1948. For the latter would steer a course toward isolationism which fit perfectly with the Communist plan for America, to bump it toward economic collapse from inflation. Mr. Wallace stated that he preferred Senator Taft to the President, as Mr. Taft was not solidly behind the Marshall Plan and opposed universal military training.

It posits a scenario where Mr. Wallace's support could throw the election to the Republicans.

Of course, Mr. Wallace, being shrewd, may well have instead been making his statements to urge the Democrats to re-evaluate some of their positions which had become increasingly conservative and scarcely distinguishable from Republican policy. His favoring Senator Taft had to come from the realization that Senator Taft, in a showdown, could not win the country's support, as all the polling data showed, that he did not bring with him the panache and youth of Governor Dewey, the greatest threat among Republicans to re-election of President Truman, and also embracing views more similar to those of Mr. Wallace than were supported by Mr. Taft.

The piece finds Mr. Wallace, however, echoing the Moscow line, as well that of Col. Robert McCormick, publisher of the Chicago Tribune and notorious isolationist. It finds the former Vice-President to be allowing himself to be used as a tool for such interests, inimical to the Marshall Plan and thus stimulative of European decline, Russian aggression, and world war.

But in their zeal to dislike and discredit Mr. Wallace, many of the columnists of the day, especially Stewart Alsop, who all but stated expressly that Mr. Wallace, in his insistence on appeasement rather than antagonism of Russia, was a Communist sympathizer, appeared purblind to his more probable actual intent.

"Ed Pauley Wears Out Friendship" reviews the past of Ed Pauley—which we summarized yesterday—and suggests that the newest controversy, his speculating in grain and corn at a time when the President had decried such speculators as contributing to inflation of prices of these precious food commodities for feeding Europe, proved that he had too many other financial interests, including oil interests, properly to serve in the Government.

His friendship with the President had earned his previous appointment as Undersecretary of the Navy in 1946, withdrawn after the trouble with Secretary of Interior Harold Ickes, and his new role as special assistant to Secretary of the Army Kenneth Royall, and had made him the target for Republican investigation, seeking to embarrass the Administration.

"One Great Step Toward Peace" finds the Senate ratification quickly of the Inter-American treaty formed at the Rio conference the previous August to have been a good thing. The treaty stood for mutual defense of the Western Hemisphere, and with the U.S. ratification, Latin American countries would follow suit. The treaty established a pole to pole "security zone" stretching longitudinally from Hawaii to Greenland, and provided for joint action on vote of a two-thirds majority of ratifying signatories to the treaty in all matters save use of military force. The latter would be binding only on the nations so assenting.

The treaty enabled elimination of the Security Council veto in the U.N. for Western Hemispheric action. Only Article 51 of the U.N. Charter, providing for a two-thirds vote of the General Assembly on certain questions, could override the veto. The treaty sent the message to Russia that the Western Hemisphere was united against outside aggression and would thus provide for world equilibrium.

A piece from the Christian Science Monitor, titled "Are All Men Equal?" informs of a well-known columnist having suggested that not more than one in a million Americans actually believed in the concept that "all men are created equal", as stated in the Declaration of Independence.

Notwithstanding, the piece finds the maxim to commend itself to free society, as President Lincoln had indicated, and should be constantly sought and approximated, even if never perfectly attained.

We suggest that the salutary precept, thus conceptualized, is as elusive "truth".

Drew Pearson provides more about the 44 American transport planes carrying 800 troops, shot down primarily by friendly fire over Catania and Gela, Sicily, in mid-July, 1943, developing additional information about the effort of Col. David Laux to prevent future occurrences of the type by seeking to have mandatory installation of self-sealing fuel tanks and armor plate on the planes. He recaps that Col. Laux had finally presented the matter directly to Secretary of War Henry Stimson, who turned it over to General Barney Giles, an opponent of self-sealing tanks for their restricting the range of the aircraft. At that point, Col. Laux was transferred to Alaska.

Shortly after Col. Laux arrived in Alaska, General Giles sent a telegram to General Dale Gaffney at Nome, directing him to obtain from Col. Laux all reports and papers he had regarding self-sealing tanks. General Gaffney became suspicious and told General Giles that he did not need an officer of the rank of Col. Laux assisting him. Nevertheless, the latter sat out the remainder of the war in Nome.

No investigation was ever conducted regarding the failure to equip the planes with self-sealing tanks prior to the Catania and Gela incidents, despite Col. Laux's insistence that there was "criminal negligence" involved. The whole matter appeared far worse than the profiteering on which Maj. General Bennett Meyers was about to be indicted, following revelations before the Ferguson War Investigating subcommittee of the Senate.

He next relates of a colonel who sought to have his haircut in the Pentagon barber shop, waited in line for 17 ahead of him to have their clipping, was about to take his seat in the chair when a general walked in and the barber said that he was next. Then, three more generals came in for their haircuts and also were provided precedence over the colonel. Mr. Pearson concludes that anyone below the rank of general should look elsewhere than the Pentagon barbershop for getting their ears lowered.

Samuel Grafton tells of the new look, uncontrolled, being a dull, myopic look. For the uncontrolled prices were so high that no one could afford the previously controlled products which were now more available, but beyond the average consumer's reach. Butter was a dollar per pound, for instance, and less of it was being produced and consumed than at any time since 1920. The new look was smug, the old, interested, one which could see beyond the end of the nose.

The new look had blind spots, overlooking, for example, expectant mothers in New York who had problems obtaining adequate food.

The new look constantly was concerned about disloyalty and doubted everyone, was wary of every step. The old look had been bold and proud, if forced to endure rationing and control for patriotic reasons.

The new look was defensive about the American system, whereas the old look accepted the notion tacitly and quietly, had nothing to prove as it manifested daily efficiency and loyalty.

He suggests that the bogey of Communism might dissipate were the country to begin moving forward again, toward providing adequate housing, food, and clothing for all its citizens. The country would be harder to hit on the move. The sitting bird which it was made it an easy target.

Stewart Alsop discusses the statement during the week by Henry Wallace that he would be willing to be a candidate for a third party and would, in any event, support such an effort unless the foreign policy of both parties changed. Barring a miracle, it meant that he would definitely run—as he would, heading the Progressive Party ticket, with Senator Glen Taylor of Idaho as his running mate, a call which Mr. Alsop makes with deft insight.

He suggests that it would please William Z. Foster, head of the American Communist Party, as the Communists were the real backbone of a third party movement. He had recently spoken in favor of a Wallace bid. The Communist hope was that a third party would make election of a right wing Republican more likely, thus weakening the country's influence abroad and its economy at home.

It would also isolate more the Communist stronghold in the labor movement, that in CIO. With the exception of the electrical workers, the CIO had largely shaken loose the Communist influence in the organization, especially after the victory of Walter Reuther at the recent UAW convention. In many state CIO conventions, especially in Wisconsin and Minnesota, where previously Communists had an impact, the influence had been eliminated. The CIO would likely endorse President Truman in 1948 for his veto of Taft-Hartley, among other things.

Mr. Wallace, himself, had stated that a third party would make the election of someone such as Senator Taft more likely, hastening the reversal of the American foreign policy, the hard line against Russia, with which Mr. Wallace disagreed. It was the conventional wisdom of this movement that such a result would return the country to a form of isolationist foreign policy.

A letter finds the Department of Agriculture out to lunch on its policy anent hoof and mouth disease among American cattle imported from Mexico. It had changed from a program of slaughter of the cattle to vaccination. He finds the wasted money on the former program remarkable.

He also believes that FDR cut the dollar to "59.06" and thus started the ball rolling toward national bankruptcy, continued during the war when inflation ran rampant. (Never mind the facts as they are often inconvenient when you're on a roll.)

He recommends that all members of Congress read Henry Hazlitt's Will Dollars Save the World? The book, he says, was printed in large letters and would not strain the eyes, was only 88 pages and cost $1.50. He says he would gladly refund the cost of purchase to any member who found the book not worthwhile.

The continuing decline of the American dollar, he warns, would result in universal ruin and prevent the country from helping its friends.

He probably had been talking to the spacemen out in Roswell for this incisive prospectus for the country and its future. Only one word comes to mind: brilliant.

Anyone who could take recent facts of the Republican party's shenanigans, aided by reactionary Democrats, with respect to inflation and turn it about to lay it off on FDR, dead for nearly three years, had to have plenty of good sense. Anyway, all the statistics showed that the rise in the cost of living, outpacing wages, had primarily taken place after price and wage controls were released following the war.

Framed Edition
[Return to Links
Page by Subject] [Return to Links-Page by Date] [Return to News<i><i><i>--</i></i></i>Framed Edition]
Links-Date -- Links-Subj.