Tuesday, October 30, 1945

The Charlotte News

Tuesday, October 30, 1945

FOUR EDITORIALS

Site Ed. Note: The front page reports that Nationalist Central Government troops in China were being rushed from Chungking to Kweisui, capital of the Inner Mongolian Province of Suiyuan, to support the fighting against the Communist forces of Mao Tse Tung in Northern China. General Fu Tso-Yi, commander of the Government troops in the area, had accused Mao of sending his troops to invade Suiyuan. The Communists accused the United States of interfering in the struggle by providing aid to Chiang's Government.

Some observers speculated that the Communists might deliberately provoke an incident with U.S. Marines in the area, ordered not to participate in the conflict. A Marine officer described the situation as "walking a tightrope."

A conference between President Truman, Prime Minister Attlee, and Canadian Prime Minister MacKenzie King, to begin around November 11 in Washington, had been set to discuss the future of atomic energy. The three-power meeting was determined by the President as necessarily prefatory to any other discussions involving other Allies, such as Russia, France, and China. Canada and Britain necessarily had shared in the secret of the atomic bomb by virtue of having contributed several of the scientists and affording some of the groundwork in atomic theory.

Meanwhile, the House Military Committee approved the creation of a nine-man commission to control nuclear energy. The proposed bill would enable scientists freely to experiment with nuclear power, provided they did not do so on a scale which would constitute a national hazard.

In Rio de Janeiro, Brazilian President Getulio Vargas had been forced by the military the previous night to resign after fifteen years in office, and was now under guard at the presidential palace. A new President, Jose Linhares, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, had been installed per the Constitution after a President was removed—whether allowing for forcible military removal being not indicated.

Sr. Vargas, educated as a doctor and a lawyer, had been consistently friendly to the United States and had led Brazil into a declaration of war against the Axis, an important step, with Brazil potentially accessible to the Germans early in the war from Dakar in West Africa. He also afforded air and naval bases for the United States during the war. Brazil sent a division to fight in the war in Europe.

Brazil now joined Venezuela and Argentina in the parade of South American coups of the past fortnight. Juan Peron, in Argentina, however, had been deposed and then re-emerged as an even stronger Superman—with powers greater than even the rich Corinthian leather on which he sat.

Sr. Linhares declared at 2:30 a.m., no doubt before throngs of anxious Brazilians, that he hoped to fulfill the peoples' wishes. He was on record as favoring the previously announced December elections—which, for some reason, could not first take place before a coup.

The opponent in the election, Maj. General Eduardo Gomes, greeted with pleasure the ouster of Sr. Vargas.

The House overwhelmingly approved the tax cut of 5.92 billion dollars reached by the joint confreres earlier in the week; the proposal would now need to clear the Senate before being signed into law by the President, expected to occur by week's end.

The President was scheduled to make a speech this night to the nation via radio, in which it was believed he would propose that industry maintain prices and pay the equivalent of 48 hours of work for a 40-hour week, in other words that industry compromise the demand of labor for a 30 percent wage increase, to keep pace with the wartime 48-hour week which included overtime pay, by granting a 20 percent increase. Exceptions on price controls would be recognized in cases of hardship.

The House Military Committee voted to take away collective bargaining rights from any union violating a no-strike pledge contained in a contract, relieving the company from the contract and imposing civil liability on the union for the breach.

Ford workers informally appeared to be in support of a strike vote, to be taken formally on November 7, to join fellow auto workers at G.M. and Chrysler, who had already voted overwhelmingly to support a strike, not yet called by the UAW, pending negotiations.

It was announced that the three discharged workers at Kelsey-Hayes Wheel Co., resulting directly in 4,500 workers at the company walking off the job in late August, and in turn impacting Ford as the supplier of its wheels, causing some 40,000 Ford workers to remain idle, had been rehired after a settlement of the matter. The three men had been terminated after accusation that they had ejected a foreman from company property.

Ford had just rolled out its new 1946 models the previous week, without price tags for OPA not yet having established the price. The 1946 models were, of course, virtually identical to the 1942 models which had ceased production mid-year, in February, 1942. Chevrolet was expected very soon to follow, also without price tags. The other major competitor in the low-price field, Plymouth, the three of which accounted for 85 percent of the automobiles produced in the country, had not yet completed reconversion.

OPA had announced lifting of all rationing on automobiles but the manufacturers stated that it would not hasten production or delivery of new models to consumers. A backlog of perhaps 15 million old vehicles had piled up during the war, and thus consumer demand would outpace production for perhaps four or five years.

In Statesville, disappointment was being expressed at the decision of the President to cancel his scheduled Friday visit, the city having spent $30,000 in preparation for a parade and other events. Secretary of the Treasury Fred Vinson, within a few months to become Chief Justice, was still scheduled to appear, but his attendance was also in question, as was that of Secretary of War Robert Patterson. Members of Congress, most of whom had suddenly determined that they would not be able to attend the functions in Statesville, were attempting to prevail on the President to change his mind.

The twentieth installment in the series of articles by General Jonathan Wainwright, continued the story of the fall of Corregidor on May 6, 1942 at noon, by previously arranged surrender broadcast by the General ninety minutes earlier. The Japanese, however, despite the hoisting at noon of the white flag of surrender, continued to bombard the fortress until shortly before 1:00, even after the notice of surrender had been repeated at 12:30.

Occasional shelling continued for yet another hour as General Wainwright awaited a Japanese officer to come to Malinta Tunnel. A Marine sent to summon the officer returned with the message that the Japanese officer in charge would not come to the tunnel, insisted instead that General Wainwright come to him. The General and his aides then rode in a Chevrolet, enduring some enemy fire, to the post of the Japanese officer. As they alighted from the car, Japanese bombers hit Fort Hughes, over two hours after the time of surrender.

When the American entourage met with junior officers, the Japanese insisted that surrender would only be acceptable of all forces in the Philippines. General Wainwright then demanded to speak directly with General Homma. He was obliged and with some difficulty was able to proceed by boat across the strait to Bataan to meet with the opposing commander, albeit without a Japanese colonel accompanying him, the colonel having balked at the sight of continued shelling of the road to the dock, fearful that he would be hit by the shells of his own troops.

Gale force winds of 50 to 80 mph whipped Nome, Alaska, causing military police to declare martial law after flooding of Nome streets with a foot of water. The village of Unalakleet, north of Nome, was leveled by the storm.

It was reported from Atlanta that the weather for Halloween appeared partly cloudy, with no moon and mild temperatures, no rain in sight, all along the Eastern seaboard.

Apparently, in 2012, thanks to global warming which does not really exist, of course, if you happen to be a Nut or illiterate, the weather patterns of Nome have been transported, via Trans-Love Airways, to the bulk of the East Coast for this Halloween.

In Orange, Va., a bull named Ferdinand escaped from a truck headed for a stock market, took off in the direction of a department store china shop, and, after the door was shut barring his access, careered down the street, pranced into a hardware store, bought a couple of hoes and spades, and was generally headed for a flower bed when captured.

The October 30, 1937 News editorial page is now available for your perusal—hush-hush and on the QT.

On the editorial page, "Wrestling With the Demon" comments on the County Commissioners' concern about widespread arrests for drunkenness in the wake of the fair, circus, and auto races, producing record dockets in the courthouse. Many of the arrests had been for bottle-hurling assaults. It finds the concern appropriate but the method of control being considered, shutting off beer consumption, to be of questionable merit.

Presently, the Commissioners were without legal authority to deny beer licenses to those qualified in any event. But the type of drunkenness displayed likely came from hard liquor, not just from beer alone.

It notes also that getting the drunks together in one locus served to inflate the ability to arrest them. It suggests that, as Prohibition had demonstrated visibly across the nation, cutting off supply would not end drinking. Rather it was the temperament of the drinker which had led to violence, and that was something over which the Commissioners could exercise little, if any, control.

"The Differential" comments on the low wages in North Carolina relative to the rest of the nation, 46th in 1944, with an average weekly wage of $28.87, half of that in Michigan.

It suggests that the proposed minimum wage of 65 cents per hour might be too much of a jump from the current 40 cents to make all at once, but was a step in the right direction.

The piece, however, does not provide a critical statistic alongside wages, cost of living, to determine the true relative earning capacity.

"Avoiding Trouble" finds anachronistic Senator Josiah W. Bailey's opposition to a plan favored by President Truman, the allowance of immigration of 100,000 Jews into Palestine, as deemed acceptable by the British as long as the United States would back up the commitment with force should there be an Arab uprising against it. Senator Bailey objected on the basis of keeping the country out of war.

But, points out the piece, every commitment made in the post-war era threatened war. It was cheaper to enable the immigration than to stand guard to insure that the Germans did not reimpose their Aryan policies again in Germany or to permit wholesale immigration to the United States. The Allies clearly owed a duty to the Jews of Europe to insure their safety.

The forty year old debate over a Zionist homeland was not going away and all of the practicalities favored the proposed immigration policy, even though it might mean war with the Arabs.

"New Word" remarks on the use of the word genocide in Count 3 of the Nuremberg indictment of war criminals, a word now and for the decades since 1945 quite commonplace in parlance, but not in usage until that time. It had been coined by Duke law professor Rafael Lemkin, set forth in his book in 1944, Axis Rule in Occupied Europe, defining it as "destruction of a nation or of an ethnic group".

The piece expresses the hope that it would only be used in this one context and would never again find utility.

"For the high purpose of the court that midwifed it, beyond the extermination of Germany's practitioners of genocide, is to outlaw this ancient crime forever."

Unfortunately, the hope was not realized.

The excerpt from the Congressional Record has Senator Theodore Bilbo of Mississippi responding to Senator James Mead of New York, the latter having condemned the action by the D.A.R. in banning from Constitution Hall in Washington the performance of Hazel Scott, pianist and singer, wife of Congressman Adam Clayton Powell of New York, based on her race.

Senator Bilbo expresses his shock at the introduction by Senator Mead of a resolution from 5,000 Protestant churches denouncing the D.A.R. action, when Mr. Bilbo thought it patriotic to ban a "boogie-woogie reception...for this jazz queen from the island of Jamaica." Senator Bilbo wanted to know more about the churches in question and who comprised them.

Senator Mead states that no Senator shocked his constituents more than Senator Bilbo, to which Senator Bilbo responds that he was not responsible for the condition of Senator Mead's constituency.

Senator Bilbo adds that New Yorkers had made a nuisance of themselves on his front porch for weeks, apparently because of his racial views. Within the past few days, he assures, he had finished a chapter in his book on race, one which was sure to extend the picket line a mile in front of his porch.

Drew Pearson tells of a recent conference between Secretary of Labor Lewis Schwellenbach and Henry Ford II, in which the grandson of the auto magnate laid forth his liberal views on labor-management relations, assuring that the company was eager to put in place new policies with respect to labor to insure the sustenance of collective bargaining, a solid departure from its labor-baiting past. He was also amenable to a 23 percent wage increase for employees, up from the previously announced 15 percent compromise, rejected by the UAW at G.M. Mr. Ford had stated that he would not seek a price hike from OPA if the UAW were to accept the compromise arrangement.

He stated that his biggest problem had been the Kelsey-Hayes Wheel Co. strike and the impact on his plants, that the UAW would need to insure that these subsidiaries parts suppliers continued production for Ford to be able to meet union demands halfway.

Mr. Pearson points out in a postscript that labor-baiting Harry Bennet had been pretty much cleared out from a position of leadership at Ford, accomplished by Henry II at the urging of his mother, as she had not liked Mr. Bennet's meddlesome tactics when Edsel, father of Henry II, had run the company prior to his death in May, 1943.

The column next salutes Washington Congressman, future Senator and Democratic presidential candidate, Henry Jackson, and North Carolina Congressman Herbert Bonner for three amendments to the Ship Sale Bill which had saved the Government between 250 and 300 million dollars. One Jackson amendment required that tankers be sold for 100 percent of their cost less depreciation, an increase over the original bill, which set the allowable minimum at 75 percent, which would have enabled sale to the oil companies at roughly half of the original cost of the tankers. This amendment would save 100 to 150 million dollars, while another Jackson amendment re shipping sales would add 50 million more in savings.

Mr. Bonner had put forth a third amendment saving another 100 million in shipping sales, preventing acceptance by the Government of trade-ins of old ships for new ships on value more than 10 percent of original cost of the old ship.

A re-printed piece from Stars and Stripes, the Army newspaper, signed by 38 of the editorial staff of the publication, seeks the reasons for the shipping shortage to bring home troops from Europe, asking initially whether the strike in New York by longshoremen, now resolved, had been the primary source, along with Atlantic storms in combination with the transfer to the British of the Queen Elizabeth and the Aquitania, the three causes contended by the Army.

It points out that, according to a letter submitted by two soldiers to The New York Herald Tribune, relying in turn on a Time article published on October 15, the United States on V-J Day had 5,000 merchant ships, utilization of just 1,000 of which could have brought home every soldier from the European Theater of Operations. Based on the Time piece, the letter had concluded that there was no shortage, but rather a surplus of ships available, simply not being used for troop transport. The loss of the Queen Elizabeth and Aquitania had not contributed to the problem as there were plenty of replacement ships available.

The piece, having laid forth the case, asks plaintively for the War Department's response and that journalists stateside seek out the true facts.

A letter writer compliments former Associate Editor Burke Davis for his series of articles recently on land in Mecklenburg County. The author suggests a study be made to achieve maximum productivity of farm land in the county.

Unfortunately, too many farmers of the state, and across the nation, would be, during the ensuing decade or so, induced to cooperate in another sort of farming, with silos underground for storage of another type of crop.

Where do you think they put them—on the moon?

A few parks, Federal and state, also.

Dorothy Thompson points out the irony of juxtaposition of two events, the speech to Congress by the President the previous week proposing universal military training and the signing by Secretary of State Byrnes of the formal protocol of deposit of the U.N. Charter, bringing the organization formally into being the previous Wednesday.

She questions about whom the President referred when he spoke of enforcing the authority of peace-loving nations through the U.N. The other nations, she points out, were vanquished. The "peace-loving nations" were now embarking on an arms race.

She contends that the Big Three, at Tehran in December, 1943, at Yalta, in February, 1945, and at Potsdam, in July, had given up on the principles of the Atlantic Charter of August, 1941, each of the three nations having signed it, Russia having put its signed in September after formation of the Charter by President Roosevelt and Prime Minister Churchill off Newfoundland, eschewing territorial aggrandizement and expressing the intent to protect all nations seeking to establish democratic freedoms, the Four Freedoms. She adds that the Big Three likewise rejected these principles at the San Francisco U.N. Charter Conference in April through June.

It was assured by the Potsdam agreement, the division of Germany into four zones of occupation, and likewise, the splitting up of occupation of other countries in Europe, that two separate blocs, East and West, would be thereby created. That, she posits, had led to the breakdown of the London Foreign Ministers Conference the previous month.

"By agreeing, in the name of 'reparations,' and 'industrial disarmament' to a four-way loot, in countries already devastated beyond imagination, they initiated, in the name of peace, a new scorched earth policy; set adrift the last remnants of order; betrayed the hopes and prayers of all Christendom; and sowed the seeds of anarchy, nihilism, and despair."

All of it transpired, she continues, while the United States had the most powerful military apparatus in the world and sole possession of the atomic bomb, "on the verge of perfection".

So, she concludes, the concept being proposed for universal military service was not to enforce the peace, but instead derived from the fact of there being no peace.

"It is asked in the frantic hope that the great nations, estimating each other's terrifying power, and maneuvering against each other over the means of the real 'peace-lovers'—the suffering, sacrificing, believing, hoping, and broken-hearted people of the world—will fear to attack each other, lest the result be mutual annihilation."

Yes, yes, yes. We could harmonize in song about that, we suppose.

But—Ms. Thompson appears to forget that the "peace-loving nations" of the earth had just fought a world war on two vastly different fronts against a massive set of enemies with the largest war machine to that point ever assembled as a cohesive bloc of nations, and had done so at the cost of millions on millions of lives in the Allied countries, heaped in heaps so high as to reach to Heaven itself in a plea for mercy, the entreaty of all the sane and rational, from further war.

So, Ms. Thompson, who could blame the leaders of your time for the way they behaved in reaction? Demonstrations of the atomic bomb in the desert of New Mexico with Hirohito present? Demonstrations for all the delegates of the San Francisco Conference?

Pray tell, to where did your memory, so intensely aware just a few months earlier of the utter vacuous nonsense of these untenable, even irrational, positions, disappear?

To us, with perfect hindsight in 2012, your words, perhaps, ring all too true and even prophetic from 1945. But, it is far more complex that that which you presented in 1945, yourself not yet aware of the forces to be unleashed in the world to come, far beyond in potential the relatively tiny explosions at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the very real dangers posed by this new infernal technology, even as to its supposed peaceful purposes for energy, dangerous as it could possibly be and destructive of the health of the earth, not surprising as its origin was impelled, and forced upon the world ultimately, by the insistence of Hitler and the Nazis to develop it first.

But once Pandora had leaped from the Box, it was nearly impossible to put it back, still is.

We have asked the existential question previously: Did we all perish that fateful Saturday night of October 28, 1962, in a blinding flash, of which none of us here in this level of reality could fathom for its instantaneous disintegration of our bodies?

You merely blinked.

Are you dead?

Are we kidding ourselves? Insisting that nothing really happened, that we all awoke on Sunday morning and went to church and all was well in Mudville?

Strange things have happened since then, have they not, stranger than fiction?

How do you know?

Maybe, killing the President of the United States was not such a hot idea, after all.

Boo.

Framed Edition
[Return to Links
Page by Subject] [Return to Links-Page by Date] [Return to News<i><i><i>--</i></i></i>Framed Edition]
Links-Date -- Links-Subj.