The Charlotte News

Tuesday, July 22, 1958

FOUR EDITORIALS

Site Ed. Note: The front page reports that the President had yielded to British insistence this date and agreed to go along with a summit meeting of the U.N. Security Council provided it was generally desired by the Western powers and Russia. A White House announcement to that effect shortly after noon this date apparently had ended a dispute with Britain over whether the Western Big Three, including France, ought move openly and directly toward a U.N. summit session or merely indicate indirectly in notes to Moscow that such a meeting might be possible. About an hour earlier, British Foreign Minister Selwyn Lloyd had told the House of Commons that Prime Minister Harold Macmillan would attend such a special meeting of the Security Council. The purpose of the meeting, according to Mr. Lloyd, would be to discuss the Middle East crisis but would not act on any resolution unless there was general agreement that such action ought be taken. White House press secretary James Hagerty said: "A United Nation Security Council meeting of the character suggested by Foreign Minister Lloyd is clearly within the contemplation of the [U.N.] Charter. If such a meeting were generally desired, the United States would join in following this orderly procedure." Meanwhile, it was learned that Secretary of State Dulles had revised the proposed U.S. note to Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev to bring it more into line with Britain's insistence that the Western powers ought open the way clearly and unmistakably for heads of government to attend an extraordinary session of the Security Council. Mr. Khrushchev had proposed on Saturday a five-power emergency summit conference at Geneva, including India, and had also asked for the attendance of U.N. Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjold. France had objected to the hostile tone of the note from Mr. Khrushchev but generally favored conditional acceptance of the idea of a summit conference.

At the U.N., a Soviet veto was expected to a Japanese plan to take further U.N. measures to protect Lebanon security and ease out U.S. troops.

In Damascus, the Syrian press reported that Kuwait and Iraq might soon join the United Arab Republic federation formed by Premier Gamal Abdel Nasser between Egypt and Syria.

In Beirut, it was reported that a Lebanese opposition leader said that U.S. troops would be pulling out soon because of the Iraqi situation stabilizing. The U.S. envoy sought political compromise.

Also in Beirut, it was reported that a U.S. Marine had been killed prior to dawn this date when he failed to answer a challenge from a sentry at a Marine outpost near the Beirut airport. An officer said that the Marine was returning from a mission and was challenged three times by the sentry, that when he failed to answer, the sentry had fired and hit him in the stomach. The wounded man had been taken to an American warship by helicopter but died before surgery could occur. The name of the dead Marine had been withheld until his family would be notified. He had been laying trip flares in front of a Marine outpost near the airport. Trip flares, similar to booby-traps, were set off by contact with part of a wire on the ground, exploding and illuminating a wide area. Marine headquarters said that investigation was underway in an effort to determine why the man had failed to answer the challenge while running toward the sentry's position. It was the second fatality among the U.S. force in Lebanon. The previous Saturday, a Navy fighter pilot had died in a crash in the mountains nearby.

Also in Beirut, it was reported that individual Lebanese were sick and tired of the entire 73-day old conflict between the rebel forces and the pro-Western Government of President Camille Chamoun, and did not care what type of solution developed as long as they ended it. That was the sentiment, in any event, of a 36-year old purchasing agent for a Lebanese firm, whose office building was under heavy rebel fire, forcing him to phone home frequently and tell his wife, at the time pregnant, that he had to work late. One of his employees had been killed and another wounded, and the man had moved his desk away from the window and felt reasonably safe, but could not tell his wife the actual reason for his working late. Ten days earlier, he had taken his wife to the hospital during the evening, an hour before the streets were cleared under curfew and before the nightly shootings and bombings would begin. The baby had arrived that night and he said that they were very fortunate, that it was hard to say what might have happened if they had to go suddenly through the streets at midnight. His work frequently took him around Lebanon into rebel-held territory and he had been shot at several times on the roads and three times had narrowly escaped exploding bombs. Although he traveled widely in the country, he said that nobody could estimate what percentage of the people were actually fighting or militantly supporting any of the various factions.

In Moscow, it was reported that the Soviet Government this date had rejected a U.S. diplomatic note protesting the downing of an American military plane over Soviet Armenia on June 27, shot down when the plane strayed over Soviet territory in inclement weather. The nine crewmen had recently been released.

A House Armed Services subcommittee would start taking testimony behind closed doors this date regarding the role of Sherman Adams in a $41,284 penalty refund to a New England textile firm. The White House said that Mr. Adams, White House chief of staff, had done no more than relay queries and information on the matter in a routine fashion. Former officials of the defunct company had denied that any White House pressure had been involved. The subcommittee chairman, Congressman Edward Hebert of Louisiana, said that several days of closed-door testimony would be taken prior to any public hearings. The subcommittee had spent the previous day studying the background without calling any witnesses. The new investigation followed lengthy hearings by another subcommittee regarding the relationship between Mr. Adams and Bernard Goldfine, a Boston textile manufacturer and real estate owner who denied that gifts he had provided to Mr. Adams were any more than out of longstanding friendship and that there was no quid pro quo in the admitted phone calls made by Mr. Adams on Mr. Goldfine's behalf to the Federal Trade Commission and, indirectly, to the Securities & Exchange Commission, both of which agencies were giving Mr. Goldfine's textile firms problems at the time. Fresh support for Mr. Adams had come from Secretary of Commerce Sinclair Weeks, who had described him as a "loyal … devoted … dedicated … honest" public servant. He had made the statement as part of a planned speech, saying further that Mr. Adams had been "whiplashed more brutally than any individual in public life in our generation," and had been "cruelly smeared by vindictive hatemongers." He said that when the whole truth was known by the public, he believed that his high opinion of Mr. Adams's rugged New England character and service to the nation would be the verdict of the fair-minded American people and that those who had been persecuting him would be ashamed.

The House Appropriations Committee this date had cut more than half a billion dollars from Defense Department construction funding requests, citing the new Air Force Academy as an outstanding example of "loose fiscal procedures". It cut 511.8 million from the 1.730 billion dollars requested by the Administration for a construction program at military bases across the world. The Air Force had suffered the greatest cut, at 300 million, from the one billion it had requested. The Navy's request for 368.2 million had been cut by 85.5 million, while the Army's request for 341 million was cut by 126.3 million. Such items as officers' swimming pools and elaborate housing accommodations were either cut completely or sharply slashed as undesirable and not essential. Many buildings at the Academy, according to the Committee, were increased in scope and cost without Congressional approval until after binding contracts had been approved, and so the Committee was especially critical of the policies and practices relating to the construction at Colorado Springs, calling it "an outstanding example of costly and inadequate planning, loose fiscal procedures, and a disregard for justifications submitted to the Congress."

The Committee this date had recommended certain appropriations for North Carolina and South Carolina military facilities construction, each of which is listed.

In Managua, Nicaragua, the President's brother, Milton, planned meetings with leaders of all Nicaraguan political factions this date after sidestepping criticism of U.S. support for Latin American dictators.

In Bombay, India, a 4,350-ton Panamanian freighter had sunk in the Arabian Sea, but a British liner had rescued 23 of the 24 crewmen, according to radio messages this date, with the missing man feared drowned.

In Little Rock, Ark., attorneys for Governor Orval Faubus this date had mailed a petition for review to the Supreme Court challenging an injunction which had ordered the Governor to cease interference with integration at Central High School.

In Charlottesville, Va., 20 black children seeking admission to white elementary schools boycotted this date achievement tests set up as a requirement for admission, the second day black students had boycotted the tests.

In Jackson, Miss., trial had begun this date before a special three-judge Federal court regarding the first challenge of Mississippi's voter registration laws which black citizens claimed were written to prevent them from voting.

Julian Scheer of The News reports that it was 156 days before Christmas, 209 days since the beginning of the year, and was sultry, humid, and sunshiny, a great day to splash in a wading pool in Freedom Park if one were a kid, to swing in swings, climb jungle gyms, slide on sliding boards, practice Little League baseball, swat one's best friend, nag one's mother for something to do, play in a soggy sand pile, chase a dog, watch out for bees in the grass, dress a doll, play house, play doctor and nurse, or cry for lunch. If a housewife, then it was a good day to hang out clothes, iron, bake a pie before lunch, shoo the kids from the yard, break up fistfights, go to the doctor's office, etc. "It is midsummer and Charlotteans—and Tar Heels—did it all today." What about catching the neighbor's escaped cat, hiked up a tree in fear of the dog? That is not listed. Why not?

Dick Young of The News reports that bulk sale of whiskey for party purposes was permissible under limited circumstances at Mecklenburg ABC stores. The head of the ABC law enforcement division told the newspaper that a group or person planning a party and desiring more than the gallon limit allowed by law to a single purchaser could arrange for a bulk purchase at a local store by first obtaining a memorandum from the central ABC office. If you are planning such a party, you may wish to read the rest of the article.

In Tulsa, Okla., there originated a 5,250-mile roundtrip ride with 70 female passengers and no complaints about backseat drivers from the two bus drivers, who described the charter trip to Seattle as "the most enjoyable" they had made.

In St. Louis, a woman who was expecting a baby in October watched a tall white bird with long legs and a beak settle on the roof of her home the previous night, staying on the roof while a crowd gathered and began ribbing her and her husband about the stork coming early. It maintained its perch for two hours despite the taunts of children and the efforts of police, until finally it began circling the house, then landed on a nearby lawn, where it was captured in a flying tackle by a police officer. The officer found that it was not a stork but rather a wild crane. It means that the child will likely be as tall as the Empire State Building.

In New York, J. O. Wright, vice-president of the Ford Motor Co., indicated this date that the company would not build a small car in the country for some time, if at all. His prediction would be rather short-lived, proved wrong within a year, following Chevrolet's announcement of its small, rear-engine car. Future Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara would be a prime mover behind the advent of the compact Ford to compete with the imported Volkswagens and Renault Dauphines—or "Dope Fiends" as we once called them by malapropism, anticipating augurially the French connection. As indicated, we also designed the little compact for Ford, which they renamed from our original drawings and specifications, dubbed "Reanek", pronounced, as in the French, "Ree-a-nek".

On the editorial page, "The 'Latest' Is Too Late for Comfort" indicates that 35 days had passed since the City Council had called for an "immediate" survey of the City Recorder's Court procedures by the Institute of Government in Chapel Hill. It had taken 30 days for municipal officials to negotiate an agreement to bring experts to Charlotte for the study, with Mayor James Smith indicating that they would be in Charlotte by September 29 "at the latest".

It finds that to be too late for an immediate remedy, as called for by the Council on June 18. They had wanted checks and balances designed to protect the court funds and records even while the grand jury was conducting its investigation. The Mayor had urged immediate action so that they would be ready to improve the situation as soon as possible. Former Mayor and member of the Council Herbert Baxter had moved to delay the Institute study until after the grand jury investigation. Mayor Smith had challenged him by saying that his motion impeded progress.

It finds that the condition of the court was such that immediate remedies were vital and should not be delayed for two months. It recommends that the Council ought insist that the Institute begin its study forthwith to address the emergency.

Meanwhile, the previous week's Civil Service Board hearing which had terminated Capt. Lloyd Henkel from the Police Department showed the need for tighter rules and regulations governing the Department.

The court scandal and related irregularities left the Council burdened with a heavy responsibility and neither the grand jury nor the Civil Service Board could shoulder the entire load.

"The Summit Was Covered with Traps" finds that the U.S. had taken quite enough risk in Lebanon without also risking further problems at a hastily-arranged summit meeting, as proposed by Premier Nikita Khrushchev for occurrence this date.

The Soviet Premier had scored a propaganda victory by suggesting the summit meeting and could profit further by advancing proposals which the West would have to reject. The West was already on the defensive before world opinion and certainly could not hope to win anything at a conference table. The only practical course was to accept the propaganda losses at the outset and avoid the risk of greater losses at a meeting.

It finds that the chilly atmosphere at the U.N. was nevertheless the best place for the West to make its stand. The Soviets had vetoed a U.S. proposal which would have made withdrawal of the Marines from Lebanon possible by the introduction of a U.N. police force. But it was the only forum where a workable arrangement could be made and where the Soviets could be forced on the defensive.

It finds that uncertainty on both sides was better than swapping assurances which would be honored only as long as it served the purpose of the Nasser-Khrushchev axis. To the present, Premier Nasser had been certain that he could add to his empire at no cost, with only an occasional overture from the Soviets. He now had to ponder being embraced thoroughly and lastingly by the Soviets, and if that was bad for the West, it would be worse for Premier Nasser.

"How Many Floods Does It Take?" indicates that the state's water resources had to be conserved but that it was only half the problem, that in certain heavy rainfall years, such as 1958, water also had to be controlled. One drought was sufficient to make a crusade of conservation. It wonders how many floods it would take to stimulate the governmental conscience similarly regarding the subject of control.

On May 17, a gullywasher had occurred in Charlotte which was bad enough, causing a weekend washout in a section west of Charlotte. Inadequate drainage had contributed to the adversity in those areas, adversity which had been preventable.

It indicates that there would be other storms and other floods with more property damaged while state and local governments disclaimed responsibility. While legal responsibility might be difficult to prove, moral responsibility ought be recognized and heeded. It finds that the protection of property, health and safety had always been the proper concern of government.

"Points of View" indicates that the American Home magazine had stated that Americans were taking a loving look at the past, that there was suddenly an uncontrollable urge to return to the wonderful world of their great-grandfathers and to things Americana.

Norman Birnbaum in Commentary had stated that in 1958, America had become "a nation so committed to the present that it had lost touch with the past and future…"

A piece from the Manchester Guardian, titled "Adventures of a Titled Diamond", indicates that the Dresden Green, the Florentine Yellow, the Star of Este, the Sancy and the Regent were all titled stones, big, expensive diamonds. Their social bracket was only a rung or two below the Hope, the Tiffany, the Koh-i-noor, "and those royal chips off the old Cullinan." In all, there were 40 titled diamonds and 50 more which had been christened by the trade for their own convenience.

Dorothy Dignam, in the new Optima, published by the Anglo-American Corp., had given their history in a chatty contribution. The corporation had a controlling interest in De Beers and perhaps was not so dazzled by diamonds as was Ms. Dignam, who regarded the gems as high romance, regretting that there was no central registry "for big-name stones", her piece providing a good basis for one.

It provides her account of the Dresden Green, picked up by Augustus the Strong for 60,000 thalers and then proceeded to use it as a hat ornament. Until World War II, it had been housed in a Dresden vault and then disappeared. Clues had led Ms. Dignam to Canada where she reached a dead end. Then about two years earlier, she had stumbled on a former Dresden museum official living in exile who told her that the stone, along with other jewels, had been hidden in the Konigstein Fortress in Dresden. In 1945, the Soviet Trophy Organization allegedly had packed the stone off to Moscow to join the Orloff, the Shah, the Paul, and the Tablet.

The Regent had a happier ending. When the French crown jewels had gone to auction in the late 19th Century, the stone had been reserved for the nation and placed in the Louvre, the last of the great diamonds left to France. Just before Paris had fallen to the Nazis in 1940, the 140-carat "burning white gem" had been smuggled out of Paris to the Château of Chambord, where they had opened a slab of marble in a fireplace and placed the stone inside. The Germans had never discovered it and when peace had returned, it was again delivered to the Louvre. Apart from those in the Tower, the Regent was among the few great diamonds on view to the public. The remainder languished in safe deposit boxes.

Drew Pearson provides the latest on the Middle Eastern situation based on exclusive diplomatic dispatches. Lebanese President Camille Chamoun had told American commanders that U.S. troops were not to fire on the rebels. American commanders had countered with the query as to how they could expect to bring order if they were to treat the rebels with kid gloves. President Chamoun had replied, in effect, that they should give him until July 24 when they would hold elections and then everything would be straightened out.

President Chamoun had conferred with his Army chief of staff, General Fuad Shehab, telling him that he had been picked to be the new president of Lebanon, but that he had to form a government of outstanding people which would not include rebels. The General had replied that it was impossible to form a national government without including rebels. There were some rebels, he had pointed out, who were against Premier Nasser and ought be in the new cabinet. As election day approached, there had been no agreement.

Some of President Chamoun's own people who had been loyal to him were now split over the landing of U.S. troops. The official tabulation of the Lebanese Parliament showed approximately two-thirds of its members against the American landing. General Shehab had been unable to obtain the cooperation of all of his military subordinates in working with the U.S. troops. Even the Lebanese ambassador in Washington had been opposed to the troop landing.

The new Iraqi government had called in the West German ambassador and told him that Iraq was ready to carry on business as usual. He was the first ambassador whom the new government had contacted, presumably because Germany transacted a tremendous business with Iraq. The German ambassador was told that the new government would not be pro-Russian and was ready to sell oil and carry on as before, except as a republic.

The Israeli Government had served notice that if King Hussein of Jordan were to fall and there would be a turnover of government in that country, Israel would not be bound by its previous armistice agreement with Jordan, permitting it to invade Jordan in case it were to fall into the hands of Premier Nasser.

The ambassadors of Pakistan, Iran and Turkey, all members of the one-time Baghdad Pact alliance, had been called to the State Department and given the results of the conference between Secretary of State Dulles and Foreign Secretary Selwyn Lloyd, with the gist of the talks having been that U.S. Marines would stay in Lebanon and British troops in Jordan for the time being. There would be no Anglo-American attempt to intervene in Iraq and it was doubted that King Hussein had the military strength to intervene. His Arab Legion was the best army in the Middle East but he could not be sure of its loyalty in any campaign outside Jordan. There had been definite consideration given to the retention of British troops in Jordan under a plan similar to that operating for years under General Glubb Pasha, the British military advisor.

The State Department was considering calling in representatives of friendly governments, especially those receiving foreign aid from the U.S., and giving them an ultimatum that either they would vote with the U.S. for a U.N. police force in Lebanon or would be considered by the U.S. members of the pro-Soviet-neutralist bloc. A surprising number of so-called friends whom the U.S. had aided with millions of dollars had suddenly decided to become aloof and vote with the Arab bloc on the issue of the U.N. police force. President Eisenhower had been depending on a U.N. force to take over from the Marines.

Joseph Alsop tells of General Claire Chennault on his deathbed. He had been one of the originators of the modern theory of airborne operations, at which the Army had laughed, for cavalry had still been more popular than airplanes in the mid-1920's when he proposed it. The Red Army had offered him a contract to test his theory in the Soviet Union, but he had refused it. He had likely been the leading American air ace during World War II, as he had racked up a score of 40-odd Japanese airplanes downed before the U.S. had ever gotten into the war. That had occurred after he had been thrown out of the Air Force in the mid-1930's because he had been tactless in his correct assessment that there was a need for a balanced air force and a lot of other things. The Army doctors who certified that he was no longer fit for active service had, nevertheless, good arguments on their side. For he was already deaf and over 40 years old when he went to Nanking, just before the major Japanese assault on China.

Possibly, Generalissimo and Madame Chiang Kai-shek did not know enough about modern medicine, but they had found him fit enough to improvise the brilliant air defense of Nanking which had utterly destroyed the first squadrons which the Japanese had deployed. When the Chinese had no more planes of their own, Madame Chiang, whom he loved, allowed General Chennault to go after the Japanese himself in his specially adapted Curtiss Hawk.

He had accumulated a nest egg from the $1,000 per bomber he shot down, deemed "foreign money" by the Army general staff when he came to Washington to organize the American Volunteer Group, later called the "Flying Tigers". Out of little more than string and chewing gum, he had devised the Chinese air warning net which had sustained China's resistance through the worst years. By the same scant resources he had also devised the AVG, comprised of some fine American pilots. President Roosevelt had given him 100 P-40's which even the beleaguered British did not want, and he had ground crews of 100 U.S. pilots of every sort. Seven had actually been Navy flying boat pilots who first tried to land their P-40's about 15 feet above the runways with unfortunate results. He did not have any staff worth mentioning or spare parts at all, or, for awhile, any ammunition for the machine guns on the planes.

No one except Diana Cooper and Air Marshal Brooke-Topham, whom they later had unjustly blamed for the attack on Singapore, had really thought that General Chennault could succeed in Burma. But at Toungoo, he invented the new P-40 tactics which successfully defeated the Japanese Zero's. They had later decorated someone else, however, for the invention. Within two weeks after he had taken the AVG into China, no more Japanese bombs had dropped.

By the time of the ugly war years at Kunming, he had become an old man, though still with jutting jaw. The battles he had with the air staff and the "brave old fool", General Joseph Stilwell, and with a lot of others had saved his Fourteenth Air Force, which in turn had saved China from going to pieces in mid-war under the impact of the last Japanese offensive. Mr. Alsop says that very few people were aware of it, but General Stilwell's military plans had never provided Chiang Kai-shek's worn-out infantry with a single machine gun bullet to use against the Japanese on any Chinese battlefield.

General Chennault had lost his last battle, to save Free China from the Communists. Mr. Alsop suggests that he might have convinced more people more easily had he had fewer faults and weaknesses. He was almost completely self-educated and when he did his own logistical calculations on the back of a dirty envelope, the results did not impress conventional officers with staff training. He also had a touchy vanity which self-educated men with very great capacities always developed when they were patronized and slighted, as he had been in his years in the peacetime Army.

"There were some other warts to provide contrast in the portrait; but I've called him the old hero because he always remained a hero to me, although I studied the warts at closest range... We shall be poorer without him."

General Chennault would die five days hence at age 64.

A letter writer says that Social Security, when enacted in 1934, was a good program on which people depended in their old age. The average citizen at present still believed it was a program wherein what was deducted from the taxpayer's earnings was maintained in the fund for the taxpayer's future security in old age, with the savings going to survivors should the recipient die before the requisite age. The legislation had been changed several times to increase the benefits and number of eligible recipients. She wonders whether the Government would delude its own people and dishonor an obligation to them which had been made by an act of Congress, finding that the many changes made to Social Security from the time of its origin had caused it to abandon practically all of the promises and programs in the original bill. It was no longer a savings, investment and annuity plan for the individual contributor, but was now a public charity program. A taxpayer might contribute for 20 years or more and he and his family would not receive any payments in return, and if a head of a household died before age 65, instead of giving his widow the payments he had put in during a long period of years, the fund now gave her $255 for funeral expenses and nothing more until she reached 65 and was able to qualify, herself, or 62 for women, and if the widow did not live until that age, all of the remainder of the funds were retained by Social Security. Perhaps those funds would be used to benefit a stranger who had contributed little or nothing. She finds it another form of taxation for which the taxpayer paid twice what he or she thought. The employer had to pass Social Security payroll deductions, due to be made for the employer's part of payment for the employee, to the public as an "operating expense", resulting in another sales tax on goods and services sold to the people, ending up by having the individual employee's part of Social Security deducted from the payroll check and in paying hidden taxes to cover a corporation's operating expenses. There was no assurance that the taxpayer or the taxpayer's immediate family would get in return what was paid into the fund, which she finds unfair and something which the general public did not understand. She finds that to many people Social Security had become a farce, that until it was amended to reflect its original purpose, it would be Social Insecurity.

Framed Edition
[Return to Links
Page by Subject] [Return to Links-Page by Date] [Return to News<i><i><i>—</i></i></i>Framed Edition]
Links-Date Links-Subj.