The Charlotte News

Monday, June 4, 1951

TWO EDITORIALS

Site Ed. Note: The front page reports, via William Barnard, that allied troops fought through driving rain in an offensive aimed toward the main enemy redoubt in North Korea, the "iron triangle" of Chorwon, Kumhwa and Pyonggang, this date, beating off a strong enemy counter-attack, which the U.N. troops, backed by artillery, were able to repulse. The enemy counter-attacked everywhere along the front, from newly captured Yonchon in the west to Kansong in the east, as the U.N. forces advanced. Tank-led forces gained three miles in some spots while at others the forces stood still. Some of the advances came in hand-to-hand fighting. The triangle of cities presented an objective because of dominating an important network of highways and affording flat country well-suited to the allied type of fighting. Rain no longer hampered movement of the tanks and infantry as the U.N. troops had learned how to maneuver in the conditions during the rain-soaked month of May.

In Hanoi in Indo-China, Vietminh forces attacked weak posts on the southern perimeter of the sector and threatened a breakthrough into the rice delta. The operation was not large but potentially dangerous. The French sent a parachute battalion and several artillery units into the area. The section had been inactive for four years and so had only weak garrisons, several of which were quickly overrun by the Vietminh of Ho Chi Minh. An estimated 30,000 guerrillas put pressure on the French in the whole southeastern sector along the Day River. The Vietminh were attacking from mountains running parallel to the river. About 75 of the Vietminh came across the river but Sherman tanks and French artillery destroyed them, while B-26 bombers sprayed napalm on concentrations of troops south of the river.

The previous day, the French Army announced that more than 2,000 Vietminh had been killed in northern Indo-China during the previous 24 hours. It said that Communist General Vo Nguyen Giap pushed more than a division of troops against French posts along a 15-mile front between Minhbinh and Phat Diem.

Secretary of State Acheson continued his testimony before the joint Senate Armed Services and Foreign Relations Committees, saying that he did not believe that Communist influence had affected the formation of U.S. policy toward China during the prior five years. In response to a request, he read a long summary of American policy in the Far East for the prior five years. He said that the U.S. had provided two billion dollars worth of aid to the Nationalist Chinese since 1945, half of which was in military supplies and the other half in economic aid, and that 75 percent of the war materiel had wound up being captured by the Communists. He cited a November, 1948 report by General Barr saying that no battle had been lost by the Nationalists for lack of equipment or ammunition but rather because of the "worst leadership and many other morale-destroying factors" which led to "complete loss of the will to fight". The Secretary also said that the decision to fire General MacArthur was based on his challenge to the policies set forth by the President and that he had concurred in the decision and helped to draft the announcement.

In Paris, Russia agreed this date to meet with the three Western powers in a foreign ministers conference in Washington on July 23, provided NATO and U.S. bases overseas would be on the agenda, both items having been previously rejected by the West.

In Dennis v. U.S., 341 U.S. 494, the Supreme Court upheld the convictions under the Smith Act of the eleven top American Communists in a 6 to 2 opinion delivered by Chief Justice Fred Vinson. It held that the conspiracy to organize the Communist Party and to teach and advocate the overthrow of the U.S. Government by force and violence created a "clear and present danger" of an attempted overthrow of the Government by force and violence, and so the defendants, convicted in October, 1949, had been constitutionally found guilty under the 1940 Act, which forbade such activity, as the statute did not infringe First Amendment free speech or free press constraints, or violate the First Amendment by infringing Fifth Amendment Due Process for indefiniteness. Justices Felix Frankfurter and Robert Jackson wrote separate concurring opinions. Justices Hugo Black and William O. Douglas dissented, primarily on the basis that the statute did violate the First Amendment. Justice Tom Clark, Attorney General at the time of the prosecutions, did not participate.

The campaign manager of Senator John Butler of Maryland was fined $5,000 for violating that state's election laws during the campaign the prior fall in which Mr. Butler defeated incumbent Senator Millard Tydings, as well as during the Republican primary. It was the campaign manager's first campaign and he had not expected to be in the role, mitigating circumstances which the trial court considered in sentencing. He was convicted for not keeping proper accounts of campaign expenditures.

Many sectors of the economy, including UAW leader Walter Reuther, were speaking out for and against renewal of wage and price controls, as sought by the Administration for two years. Mr. Reuther, in a prepared statement for the Senate Banking Committee, urged reduction of "the standard of luxury of the few" before reduction of the "standard of living of the many". He was willing to accept wage stabilization as long as accompanied by equality of sacrifice. He favored price ceilings for cost-of-living and defense items.

In New York, a police officer jumped six stories to his death out of a courthouse window during his trial for protection of gambling rackets.

In Clinton, N.C., seven members of a Sampson County farm family, sleeping on a quilt in the woods near their home, were run over by a car driven by a 20-year old son of the family, but only two of them, the mother and a 14-year old son, were injured, neither seriously. The young man had returned home at 4:00 a.m. to find it empty and went looking for his family in the woods when he inadvertently drove over them.

In Charlotte, a Florida man, his wife and their two-year old son miraculously escaped death when a tractor-trailer truck overturned onto their convertible. A small black dog belonging to the child also was spared. The man had pushed his wife and son out of the front seat as he saw the truck toppling over toward the car and he then followed their exit. The dog leaped out on its own. Where the man had been sitting, the steering wheel sliced into the seat. The Akers Motor Lines truck was carrying a load of yarn when it jack-knifed after it tried to return to its lane while passing, forced by another car also passing.

An Associated Press piece reports that no matter how bad the weather was where the reader lived, it was a good bet that it was worse elsewhere. The South, for the most part, was parched, after seven weeks of drought. In Wyoming, Colorado and Montana, temperatures in many areas dipped into the 20's over the weekend and a foot of snow fell in Colorado. San Antonio, Tex., had 6.1 inches of rain. Nebraska had experienced three days of torrential rains. Showers were occurring from the eastern Great Lakes region southward to the Appalachian Mountains, into the Ohio Valley, to the lower Rio Grande Valley. And so on, and so forth...

On the editorial page, "Shall We Unite or Perish?" recommends exploration of the Atlantic Union concept, as explored the prior Thursday and Friday in two articles by News publisher Thomas L. Robinson. The concept, which would be approved, if at all, by a citizens convention, would enable the seven originally participating countries, the U.S., Britain, France, Canada and the Benelux nations, to form a common federal union to which would be delegated certain powers which could be more efficiently handled by the combination than individually, to produce a more efficient common defense and pooling of their resources and industrial production capabilities. It ventures that since the diplomatic route to avoidance of war had failed over time, it was worth at least exploration, especially as so many prominent citizens of both political parties were advocating its creation.

"Here Comes the Kids" urges more parental responsibility exercised over their children as summer approached and they were being released from school. In modern urban environs, that meant exposure to cars, liquor, cigarettes and all-night cafes or pavilions at the beach. The old swimming hole or cow-pasture ball field would no longer suffice as a means of distraction for the summer. A realistic alternative had to be found to the "fun" which produced delinquency.

Let's start by using correct syntax in the title, which should read "Here Come the Kids"—unless, of course, they were all coming at you en masse—perhaps as would appear to Mayor Richard Daley and his Police Department in Chicago in August, 1968—, a bit condescending to assume that all were of the same delinquent ilk, especially as you just got through saying a couple of weeks back that only a few in the city were troublemakers.

A piece from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, titled "Keystone of Military Justice", comments favorably on the new uniform military code and civilian Court of Military Appeals for producing better, more uniform justice in military court proceedings.

Drew Pearson tells of former Senate Majority Leader Scott Lucas of Illinois recently walking out on a dinner to which he was invited, for the Duke and Duchess of Windsor, after Senator Estes Kefauver arrived and was seated at the same table. Senator Lucas held a grudge against Senator Kefauver because his crime investigating committee had held hearings in Chicago at the same time of the prior fall election which Senator Lucas lost, blaming the timing of the committee probe for his defeat.

The airlines were getting a Government subsidy but there was no way of knowing how much it was. The President wanted these subsidies made public but the Air Coordinating Committee, appointed by the President, wanted to maintain them as secret, consistent with the desires of the airline lobby. Presently, the subsidies were hidden in the postal grants paid to the airlines for carrying airmail. Pan Am received 46 million dollars in such payments the prior year, four times the basic rate based on weight of passengers. The President also wanted the international rate made public, though the Committee wanted that also maintained in secret. He concludes that the Committee appeared to be working for the airlines and not the taxpayers.

Reactionary Gerald L. K. Smith was in Washington recently boosting General MacArthur for president.

Senate Majority Leader Ernest McFarland had written to Democratic Senators complaining that they were too busy watching the MacArthur hearings, holding investigations and making speeches and not tending to business.

Joseph Alsop tells of Air Force chief of staff General Hoyt Vandenberg testifying before the joint Senate committees that the Air Force was operating on a "shoestring", a statement filled with hyperbole as the Air Force had a twenty billion dollar budget. Nevertheless, it was easy to understand the statement as the Air Force operated on two basic assumptions, that the present strength of the strategic Air Force was sufficient to destroy Soviet industry by atomic bombardment and therefore could buy time, and that by 1953-54, when the Russians would have built up their atomic stockpile, the West would be sufficiently strong either to deter an attack in Europe or halt it if undertaken.

Because emphasis had been placed by Secretary of the Air Force Stuart Symington and General Vandenberg, when Louis Johnson was Secretary of Defense, on using the limited Air Force budget at the time for building up the Strategic Air Command, it had the capacity now to destroy Soviet industry, a capacity which would be increased. General Vandenberg and others in the Air Force command structure wanted SAC increased from 40 of the planned 95 air groups to 50, and wanted all of the long-range bombers to be fast jets to counter improvements in Soviet air defenses. They also wanted more and better reconnaissance planes and more and better long-range fighter protection.

But the second part of the equation, regarding defense of Western Europe being ready by 1953-54 to stop a Soviet attack, was probably not realizable in that time period. Even with 70 divisions of infantry to put on the ground, the Western defenses would be far outnumbered by the Soviet strength in ground forces. That superiority could only be neutralized through superior air strength. It would likely be the case that the Soviets would have 15,000 planes ready for battle in Europe by that time, whereas the West would have only 7,000 to 8,000. Thus, there would be no real defense of Western Europe available by 1953-54, as the Soviets would be superior on both the ground and in the air, meaning that Western strategy was based on false assumptions.

Robert C. Ruark tells of Americans being too reluctant to engage in bargaining on prices to bring down the cost-of-living. He suggests that the psychology of bargaining actually encouraged respect among salespeople for the customer. "No" was the operative word in any such bargaining situation. He tells of a White Russian princess who had lived in the U.S. for many years who regularly engaged in bargaining whenever she bought anything. It always surprised the salesperson but she got the price she wanted. He urges the practice.

A letter signed by a group of Army sergeants, corporals, and privates stationed in Yoju, Korea, originally from Charlotte, with the principal writer, a sergeant, saying that he had been a Duke Power Co. bus driver, tells first of their route to Korea and that they had spent the previous three months close to the front lines but never at them, with most of their work being road and bridge maintenance. The letter complains about an article in The News telling of an unnamed corporal who was labeled "Old Soldier" and "War Vet", terms which gave the soldiers pains in the neck and horse laughs. The article was causing their families too much worry, such that they thought that their letters home might be concealing information.

The corporal in question, the letter informs, had been discharged before he ever left Pusan and so they wondered where The News came up with the phrase "War Vet" to describe him.

It concludes that they were only interested in having their families in Charlotte know the truth so that they would not worry about them.

A second letter, from a private stationed at Chonham, Korea, expresses the same sentiment, adding the same information about a private who had been quoted in the same News piece, that he had also been discharged before leaving Pusan.

The editors add that they realized that soldiers returning from Korea had a tendency to embellish their experiences and so did not wish to cause embarrassment to the soldiers named and so blanked out their names in the letters.

This date fifty years ago, Senator Robert Kennedy won the California Democratic presidential primary with 46 percent of the vote to 42 percent polled for Senator Eugene McCarthy. The result made Senator Kennedy a legitimate challenger to Vice-President Hubert Humphrey for the presidential nomination at the August Democratic National Convention to be held in Chicago. Vice-President Humphrey commanded an extensive lead in delegates, both formally and informally committed, but a formidable challenge nevertheless could lie ahead by Senator Kennedy, especially if Senator McCarthy proved willing to join the effort, something he had declined to do earlier in the day, prior to the outcome of the primary.

At around midnight Pacific time, Senator Kennedy, after receiving a concession from Senator McCarthy, addressed a gathering of enthusiastic supporters in the ballroom of the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles. After finishing the short address, he was directed by aides to an exit route through the hotel kitchen pantry.

At that point, a few minutes after midnight, he was shot, with one bullet entering his head, behind his right ear, and two others entering his right shoulder. The ultimately fatal bullet to the head traveled, according to the autopsy report, from right to left, in a slightly frontward and upward path. The other two bullets followed a right to left, back to front, upward path, with one passing through the Senator, entering in the area of his right armpit and exiting near his right collarbone, and the other entering just below the entry point of the second bullet and lodging at the sixth vertebra. The two recovered bullets were both .22 caliber.

Sirhan B. Sirhan was taken into custody immediately after being pounced on by persons in the pantry who grabbed his hand with the gun and directed it downward as he continued to fire until it was empty.

Senator Kennedy was still alive and conscious after the shooting and was able to ask if everyone was alright. Others were wounded in the pantry but no one so seriously as the Senator.

He would linger for the ensuing 25 hours until death came on Thursday, June 6 at 1:44 a.m., at the Good Samaritan Hospital in Los Angeles.

The shooting occurred on the first anniversary of the start of the Six Day War between Israel and Egypt, Syria, and Jordan, June 5 through 10, 1967, the basis subsequently asserted by Sirhan for the shooting, that he had seen Senator Kennedy recently endorse sending of additional jets to Israel, which he believed anathema to his native Jordan.

It was the second tragedy for the nation in a span of two months. It was the third assassination of a prominent statesman and leader of the country in the previous four and a half years. And it was the second loss in the Kennedy family within that same latter period.

Arguably, though time went on and people returned to their normal daily routines, the country would never quite be the same thereafter.

As with President Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., it is probable that we shall not soon see the like of Senator Robert Kennedy again, the heartbeats and voices of all three having been silenced prematurely at relatively young ages, 46, 39, and 42, respectively, by wanton gunfire.

As an ironic postscript to this tragic day, adding ambiguity to already prevailing chaos in the country, this piece by Drew Pearson appeared in many newspapers across the land. But that information, undoubtedly supplied by J. Edgar Hoover, had derived from July, 1963, four months before, and, no doubt, an order actually arising from and in a desire to appease FBI director Hoover, to placate rather than allow to fester the fires of discord in the face of the pending Civil Rights legislation proposed by the Kennedy Administration to Congress, Mr. Pearson's contrary information five years later, blaming the wiretap exclusively on then-Attorney General Robert Kennedy, notwithstanding. (See Exhibit 9, et seq., beginning at page 165, to the 1976-1977 "Report of the Department of Justice Task Force to Review the FBI Martin Luther King, Jr., Security and Assassination Investigations")

Framed Edition
[Return to Links
Page by Subject] [Return to Links-Page by Date] [Return to News<i><i><i>—</i></i></i>Framed Edition]
Links-Date Links-Subj.