The Charlotte News

Monday, April 3, 1950

THREE EDITORIALS

Site Ed. Note: The front page reports that the President had formally notified Senator Millard Tydings of the Senate Foreign Relations subcommittee, investigating the charges of Communists in the State Department brought by Senator McCarthy, that he had instructed Federal officials to ignore the Senate subpoenas for the Government loyalty board records on certain individuals named by the Senator as having Communist sympathies. The President said that no President had ever complied with a legislative subpoena directed to the executive branch to produce confidential documents and that disclosure of them would be contrary to the public interest and compromise the investigative ability of the FBI and the availability to it of confidential informants, and would harm innocent persons named in the files. He cited precedents occurring during the terms of Presidents Washington, Monroe, Jackson, and Cleveland to support the position. President Washington had concluded that while the Congress could subpoena documents generally, the President then should provide only such papers which the public good would permit.

In an address to the ERP administrators in Washington, General Marshall urged that ERP aid not be cut by Congress but also believed that the program ought end after 51 months, as scheduled, June 30, 1952, as the countries receiving the aid ought be encouraged to lift themselves up without U.S. assistance. He praised the effort which had transpired in the prior two years since Marshall Plan aid was first provided to Western Europe.

The President asked Congress again to enact the Brannan agriculture plan, designed to produce cheaper consumer food prices while providing farm subsidies to keep up produce prices for the farmer.

The Supreme Court this date heard oral arguments in the case of Elmer Henderson, a black man who had been a wartime traveling representative for the Fair Employment Practices Commission, established by FDR's executive order pursuant to the War Powers Act, contending that he was denied, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, equal access to Southern railroad dining car facilities during a 1942 trip between Washington and Birmingham. The Justice Department was arguing the case in his behalf against the policy adopted by the Interstate Commerce Commission to allow segregated dining car facilities on interstate trains. Representative Sam Hobbs of Alabama, a member of the House Judiciary Committee, took up the cudgels against the Justice Department position, having been urged, he said, to do so by other Committee members.

The following day, the Court would hear arguments in the case of Sweatt v. Painter, regarding the claim that the University of Texas ought admit to its law school Herman Sweatt, who qualified but for his race, contending that the black law school established by the State was not equal to that of the University of Texas. It would also hear argument in the case of G. W. McLaurin, complaining that the seating arrangements provided him in classes at the University of Oklahoma in response to court orders for his admission for want of separate-but-equal facilities, were improperly segregated from the white student seating.

In Tokyo, the Army reported that engine trouble in the two-engined plane piloted by husband and wife, Dianna and Bob Bixby, during their attempted round-the-world airspeed record, had caused them to return to Calcutta two hours after takeoff. They still had a chance to beat the record established in 1947 by the late Bill Odom, killed in an air race crash the previous year in Cleveland, provided they could get their engine repaired within three to four hours.

In Munich, Hermann Goering's buried treasure, once estimated to be worth a million dollars, was valued at less than $2,500, after being discovered the previous Friday in a castle near Nuremberg which Herr Goering had once occupied as his residence.

In Charlotte, a 15-year old boy, awaiting a preliminary hearing on the charge of murdering a service station operator in Charlotte the previous Saturday night, utilizing a tire hammer, pictured on the page, was observed in his cell by reporters reading a book of Bible stories. If the judge found probable cause that he had committed the crime, he would be bound over to Superior Court for trial as an adult, facing potentially the death penalty. Police said that he had admitted lying in wait for the man inside the man's panel truck, bludgeoned him with the hammer, then robbed him of $550. The man died in the hospital about an hour later. The boy was arrested by the County Police within 24 hours, locating him through a check of the man's contacts who would have known his truck and that he carried money. The boy had worked odd jobs for the man at the station.

Ralph Gibson of The News relates of an interview conducted at the jail with the boy. Mr. Gibson had asked him if he had planned the attack during Saturday afternoon, to which the accused responded, "No, sir, I didn't mean to kill him; I was just going to take his money."

He is undoubtedly going to receive a fair trial when the case is called.

Isabelle Howe, on page 12-A, begins a weekly column, "The Shop Talker", regarding a survey of Charlotte shops for the budget-wise shopper for clothing, furnishings, and services.

We look forward to each installment.

Not mentioned on the page, this date in 2017, the University of North Carolina basketball team defeated that of Gonzaga University, 71 to 65, to earn the N.C.A.A. national championship for the year. We congratulate the Tar Heels for their victory, achieved in the last 90 seconds of the game, and offer kudos as well to the Gonzaga Bulldogs for a game well-contested throughout. The game was back and forth, with neither team ever getting more than a briefly held seven-point advantage. The final margin was the largest obtained by UNC. Neither team shot well, but it was a lesson in defensive excellence on both sides of the court. It is, we think, the most enjoyable UNC championship game, win or lose, which we have ever seen, which includes all of them save a couple, the latter of which was the 1957 game, through which we slept—not because it was not exciting in hindsight but rather because it started past our bedtime, not unlike the New Year's Eve Georgia Tech game this year, albeit starting too early. We also missed the one in 1946 for a pressing appointment elsewhere, but later heard about it personally from one of the participating players.

It is UNC's sixth national title, not counting the 1924 mythical championship before the start of the N.C.A.A. Tournament in 1939, going back to their first one in that undefeated season of 1957, and represents only the second time that UNC teams have gone to the finals two years in a row, the last being 1981-82, when they also won the national championship on the second consecutive attempt, having failed on the first one. The Tar Heels have advanced to the finals on eleven occasions and to the Final Four twenty times, eighteen times in the past 51 seasons since 1967. Last year was the only time they have lost in the finals since 1981, and only the fifth time overall, the others being in 1946, 1968, and 1977. It is the third national championship for Roy Williams, in his fourteenth season as head coach at UNC, following championships in 2005 and 2009. This team has the most defeats of any UNC champion, but they were only seven nicks in the armor, making the victory all the sweeter in the end.

We did predict the final score, incidentally, as is evident from our Saturday offering, viz., UNC defeated UT-Chattanooga the first time they met, December 21, 1982, 73 to 66, and Elvis Presley, on April 3, 1956, on the Milton Berle Show, aboard the U.S.S. Hancock, sung a lyric which perfectly correlates on our calculus to 71 to 65, that is "one for the money" from 66, and "two for the show", from 73, and another three in the bucket and go, cat, go. (You could also adopt an alternative method of interpolative exegesis to find at least the UNC score from adding xxxix to xx, and then adding the Twelve Apostles, but that is fishing, as we cannot understand the opponent's score from that modality. But maybe you can figure it.)

In any event, you better lay off our shoes. They are supplied by Tarus Heelius Nippin Tuckus, the Greek goddess of basketball, who tells us much of what we know. And it pays to listen to former President Obama, whose bracket final prediction coincided with ours.

Thank ye, thank ye very much.

Parts of chapters sixty-six and sixty-seven of The Greatest Story Ever Told by Fulton Oursler appear on the page as part of the abridged serialization of the book.

That Friday, April 7, incidentally, is upcoming this week, albeit, unlike 1950, not in celebration of Easter in 2017 until the following weekend.

On the editorial page, "Hopes for Natural Gas Jolted" finds that the Federal Power Commission decision the previous week to deny the application of Piedmont Natural Gas Corp. in favor of Commonwealth Natural Gas Corp. to build a pipeline to serve the natural gas needs of Virginia had left, for the present, the Carolinas without access to cheap natural gas. Piedmont was planning to submit a new engineering plan which could make service only to the Carolinas economically feasible, whereas their earlier contention to the FPC had been that service of that limited market could not turn a sufficient profit to justify building the pipeline.

The piece points out that it opened the door, however, for the plan of Carolina Natural Gas Corp., to tap the existing line of Transcontinental, serving the Northern and Eastern areas. The FPC would have to approve that plan and if it did not, the Carolinas would be without access to natural gas. It hopes that the needs of the public for such access would be served.

"Library Deficiencies" discusses a book, Libraries of the Southeast, by Louis Round Wilson of UNC and Marion A. Milczewski of the University of California, positing that the Southeast had lagged behind in development vis-à-vis the rest of the nation for lack of adequate school and public library facilities. They had marshaled facts to support that contention, including lack of adequate books, lack of school staffing, and limited service to black schools and libraries. School libraries in the Southeast were also inadequate, particularly for rural whites and blacks, a deficiency which ran through the university level. North Carolina fared favorably versus other Southeastern states but was still lagging behind the non-Southern states.

The nine Southern states had spent only nine cents per capita on public libraries in 1946-47, or 4.5 million dollars, and if that were doubled or tripled, it ventures, it would be a small price to pay given the salutary results to be realized.

Heck, we never ev'n heard of that danged "thus spake Zaraboosterrooster" until we done seen it one night, freshman year, down there at the Louis Round Wilson, back in the stacks, whilst tryin' to write out our philosophy. It done changed ever'thing for our perception of reality. Until then, we thought ever'thing was on the square.

"Easter Says God Will Win", a by-lined editorial by the Reverend James G. Huggin of Myers Park Methodist Church, explains that Easter meant that God expects to win on all fronts, not just winning a soul here and there. He quotes from the anti-slavery poem, "The Present Crisis" by James Russell Lowell, and asserts that the verse was authenticated by Easter. The evidence was that the dead Jesus had become the living Lord for countless people through the centuries.

He suggests that when people grew discouraged and evil appeared to triumph, they should not despair as the "decisive factors" shaping the course of history were not always evident "behind the dim unknown", as Lowell had described "God within the shadow".

Through doors opening from beyond, he suggests, the living God entered to shape the thoughts and plans of man. Where God could find persons who trusted, "He will bare His mighty arm in their behalf."

Well, now, that's not very kindly to the losing team last night, is it, Doc? They must have been Evil-doers, or at least slow-learners.

A piece from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, titled "That Cad Gabrielson", finds that RNC chairman Guy Gabrielson had not been indelicate for suggesting a trial marriage between Republicans and Dixiecrats as the two had been living together outside wedlock for some time already. But it was a political faux pas to mention it publicly and so Mr. Gabrielson had performed as a cad in doing so.

"He has besmirched the name of a Southern lady by suggesting that someone needs to make an honest woman of her. And all because she is a little free with her favors, as any high-spirited girl might be." It concludes that he ought be "plumb ashamed of himself".

You don't need a plumb bob just to hoe the ground.

Drew Pearson tells of diplomatic cables reporting that a sweeping famine was impacting the Communist Government in China, affecting 80 million people from Shanghai to Inner Mongolia. It had been caused by floods which had cut production by 30 to 40 percent in the fertile Yangtze Valley. Farmers had hidden their grains after two-thirds of the crops produced had been seized by the Communists, leading to executions of such farmers. In the cities, Chinese merchants were forced to give up stocks of rice.

Meanwhile, complicating things further, Russia was sending 10,000 soldiers and administrators on the pretext of helping the fledgling government while planning to take it over as a satellite, with Shanghai already virtually a Russian-controlled city

Anti-Communist guerrillas were active, especially in Kwantung Province around Canton, and peasants were being secretly armed to defy the grain collectors. Too much force against the population was seen to produce reaction.

Congressman Frank Karsten of St. Louis argued with Congressman Mel Price of East St. Louis that the latter's belief that the flying saucer sightings were the result of figments of the imagination and hoaxes was in error, as Mr. Karsten claimed to have seen one.

We knew it all along. They are here. How else would you explain our present "President"?

The fiscally conservative Dixiecrat Senator Harry F. Byrd of Virginia, he suggests, ought get acquainted with his alter-ego, the Virginia apple grower. He had recently attacked the school lunch program as school lunches, he offered, should be bought by parents for only the 20 to 25 cents they cost. Yet, he raised no objection to the Government's recent Consumer Credit Corporation purchase of over 32,000 bushels of apples for the school-lunch program in Frederick County, Va., where he had his orchards. Though not benefiting directly from the sale, himself, the price paid under farm support prices was designed to keep the price of apples firm and so indirectly worked to the advantage of Senator Byrd. So many such apples had been purchased by the Government the previous year that they were distributed to schools not normally participating in the school lunch program. The program had spent $400,000 in Virginia, a state run efficiently by the Byrd machine.

He imparts of Justice Sherman Minton showing his two and a half-year old grandson around the Supreme Court chamber, when the latter softly imparted, "Now, Granddaddy, we'll wait for Jesus."

He obviously foresaw the problem of confirmation of a Republican President's nominee in 2017, after the Senate's refusal in 2016 to abide unaltered precedent since the Founding, and not provide hearings for a Supreme Court nominee, who happened to have been nominated by a Democratic President, on the phony excuse that the vacancy happened to occur in an election year, ignoring the many precedents to the contrary, spanning back to the nomination of John Marshall as Chief Justice by President John Adams after his defeat in the bitterly fought 1800 election to Thomas Jefferson, Chief Justice Marshall being confirmed in the lame-duck period before President-elect Jefferson's inauguration in March, 1801.

And Senator Mitch McConnell misrepresents the record when he proclaims, as he said during the weekend, that not one time has a justice-designate been blocked by Senate filibuster. We only need look as far back as 1968, with the filibuster-blocked nomination of Justice Abe Fortas to become chief, to find the example which he says has never occurred. But, he will undoubtedly have some phony-baloney explanation to distinguish that case from what he regards as a true filibuster, as that one involved the Southern states-righters and some Republicans protesting the liberal opinions of Justice Fortas, leading to the successor in office to President Johnson, President Nixon, being able to appoint D. C. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Warren Earl Burger to replace retiring Chief Justice Earl Warren, despite the fact that a procedural vote had shown that a majority of the Senate would have voted to confirm Justice Fortas, just not reaching the necessary vote for cloture in fall, 1968. But that never occurred, as Senator McConnell is infallibly right. Moreover, we have to wonder how he will reconcile his statement of just a few months ago, if the Republicans are hell-bent for leather on ending filibusters with respect to Supreme Court nominees through the "nuclear option", that changing Senate rules, he has always believed, requires a two-thirds majority vote of the Senators voting. He will, undoubtedly, supply more fabular, specious argument, we suppose, until we justify also throwing out all the rules and replacing them with the Republican Playbook for Capturing the Government and Producing Chaos in the Country.

If there are no rules, then there are no rules. Be careful of that for which you wish, stupid...

What if? all the players last night in the ballgame suddenly held a huddle at mid-court and a majority voted assent to the proposition: "There are too many damned fouls being called, and most of them are little chippies. If they have their way, this game is going to wind up being concluded by the managers. Let's take over this show and ignore the whistles, as if we are on the playground again, a return to our youth and fun, and show these bastards who, in fact, control the action. We've paid the price of physical conditioning and no fat, little referee is going to tell us what to do ever again. It's our ball and our ballgame from now on. Revolt! Storm the Bastille! Lock 'em to the benches! Who's in?" Don't deny that, in the heat of the moment, it would meet with instantaneous popular approval from the crowd, at least until the following morning when they realized what they had done.

We agree with Senator John McCain that if the Republican majority invokes the "nuclear option" ploy with respect to Supreme Court nominees, it would be a "dark day" for the Senate.

Having said that, later the same day, he has hypocritically declared that to avoid a filibuster of the nomination submitted by the current "President", he will go along to get along with his party and agree to vote for the "nuclear option" he has roundly condemned. By tomorrow, he may come out for bombing the Martians.

Marquis Childs discusses changes being made by the President to the Defense Establishment to give the Secretary of Defense an opportunity to review defense spending to assure that the public was getting its money's worth. General Eisenhower had testified to Congress that there was a growing perception that defense boondoggles were not merely tolerated but were encouraged. One example was the Air National Guard costing 114.7 million dollars per year, with 104 million sought in the 1951 budget, whereas high-ranking officers in all services, including the Air Force, believed the money was being wasted insofar as any contribution to national security.

A board headed by current Army Secretary Gordon Gray had concluded in 1948 that the Air National Guard ought be brought under Federal control with Air Force standards applied. That report had been approved by Air Force Secretary Stuart Symington. But powerful political pressure had been brought to bear to prevent it from being implemented. The National Guard Association objected, as did many governors of the states, who headed each unit of the Air Guard and who flew around in Air Guard planes.

Mr. Childs concludes that an independent assessment would show that the money was being wasted on the Guard at the expense of national security.

Robert C. Ruark tells of humorist Abe Burrows grousing on the radio recently that people had become so sensitive that it was nearly impossible for a comedian to laugh at anyone beyond himself. Any form of humor which appeared to mock dialect was out. Mr. Ruark thought of Al Jolson and such dialect being the mainstay of his act. He could still get away with it because he was accepted as a performer, but a newcomer could not.

Octavus Roy Cohen had written stories in black dialect for The Saturday Evening Post, but had stopped writing them because of the growing sentiment against presenting the Southern black in an undignified light. The same had occurred to Roark Bradford and his "John Henry" stories.

Similarly, the Yiddish dialect had almost disappeared from stories, even among Jewish humorists. He doubts that Montague Glass could function in 1950 with his "Potash and Perlmutter" stories.

The film "Oliver Twist" had been banned in some places for its portrayal of the Jewish character Fagin as a villain. He finds it to have been quibbling regarding such a faithful adaptation of an old story by Charles Dickens, as Bill Sykes, the murderer, was characterized in the same novel as an Englishman.

He says that he opposed the lampooning of any people or creed on a wholesale basis but could not agree with such sensitivity to gentle parody of an individual type that it became taboo to do. Soon, he suggests, something would have to be done, adhering to that standard, about the character Othello. The Danes would object to Hamlet and Egyptians, Aida, the Spaniards, Don Quixote, and the Gypsies, Carmen. Most of Mark Twain's oeuvre would have to be burned. The minstrel show was already a thing of the past.

He hopes that the trend would ease.

Well, now, wait just a minute, heya. What you talkin' 'bout, boy? You must be some kind o' Yankee comin' down heya wid dat.

A letter from J. Edgar Hoover thanks The News for its editorial of March 20, "Two Dangerous Amendments", taking issue with the proposed legislation in the House to give adjudicatory functions regarding loyalty investigation to the FBI, already charged with collecting the data. Mr. Hoover asserts that the Bureau had always been proud to serve as a fact-finding agency and kept itself apart from any judicial functions. He believed it central to the American way of life to keep those functions separate. But, he adds, the Bureau would undertake whatever responsibilities which were entrusted to it in an "impartial, objective, and effective manner."

He also mentions, in the same vein, the Herblock cartoon appearing on the page of that date.

A letter writer suggests that the latest tale regarding the supposed disappearance of Joseph Stalin was designed by reactionaries to provide cold war ammunition.

A letter writer wonders why Communists working for the enemy were not being prosecuted as had been certain Americans during the war, for broadcasting anti-American propaganda. He wants to know what the difference was between treason in war and treason in peace.

Look up the legal definition of treason and you might understand. Notwithstanding, there were plenty being prosecuted for espionage or taking secret documents for that purpose, or, where the statute of limitations had expired, for perjury for baited denials of having been Communists, or, in the case of the top Communist Party leaders in the country, for violation of the Smith Act. He must have wanted the death penalty imposed.

A letter from a representative of J. O. Jones, Inc., thanks the newspaper for its section on Men's Fashion Week in Charlotte.

Well, we were pleased to present it.

A letter from the corresponding secretary of the Chantilly PTA thanks the newspaper for its publicity regarding the school and its open house on March 26, as it had been a complete success.

A Quote of the Day: "Another fascination of a television set is that it lets you see the ring of the doorbell—or even the hum of your neighbor's vacuum cleaner." —Dallas Morning News

But which one, Hoover or Bissell—or both in concert?

Framed Edition
[Return to Links
Page by Subject] [Return to Links-Page by Date] [Return to News<i><i><i>—</i></i></i>Framed Edition]
Links-Date Links-Subj.